2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.04.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural correlates of familiarity and conceptual fluency in a recognition test with ancient pictographic characters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The variability of meaningfulness ratings in all four experiments reliably justifies the individual rating method we used for each subject. On the basis of these methods, our behavioral studies in Experiment 1 and 2 found that conceptual priming was only evident for stimuli rated by individual subjects as meaningful, which was in line with prior studies using various stimuli, for example, squiggles (Voss and Paller, 2007 ; Voss et al, 2010b , 2012a ), obscure words (Voss et al, 2010a ), and ancient Chinese characters (Hou et al, 2013 ). On the basis of prior studies, we further found color effects on response facilitation are selective for High-M stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variability of meaningfulness ratings in all four experiments reliably justifies the individual rating method we used for each subject. On the basis of these methods, our behavioral studies in Experiment 1 and 2 found that conceptual priming was only evident for stimuli rated by individual subjects as meaningful, which was in line with prior studies using various stimuli, for example, squiggles (Voss and Paller, 2007 ; Voss et al, 2010b , 2012a ), obscure words (Voss et al, 2010a ), and ancient Chinese characters (Hou et al, 2013 ). On the basis of prior studies, we further found color effects on response facilitation are selective for High-M stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, some experiments have shown that familiarity occurs even without FN400 effects (Yovel and Paller, 2004 ; Danker et al, 2008 ; Voss and Paller, 2009 ) suggesting that perhaps FN400 is not a unique indicator of familiarity. Other findings have indicated that FN400 effects could reflect conceptual processing during recognition (Olichney et al, 2000 ; Voss and Paller, 2006 , 2007 ; Voss et al, 2010a ; Voss and Federmeier, 2011 ; Hou et al, 2013 ). For instance, Voss et al ( 2010a ) used obscure words as stimuli so as to dissociate the neural correlates of familiarity and conceptual processing; the results indicated that FN400 effects were found only for the words that elicited meaningful associations, despite matched familiarity with meaningless words that did not produce FN400 effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…LPC enhancement has also been reported for familiar compared to unfamiliar stimuli [63]. As the relative familiarity of brand products and no name products differed, an alternative explanation of the greater LPC could be that this simply reflects different degrees of familiarity rather than differential emotional engagement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Accordingly, two time windows, 300-550 ms and 550-800 ms, were used to capture the frontal and parietal intact/new effects, respectively. Mean amplitudes for statistical analyses in these windows were obtained from frontal (collapsed across F3, Fz, and F4), the central (collapsed across C3, Cz, and C4) and the parietal (collapsed across P3, Pz, and P4) scalp locations (Han et al, 2018;Hou et al, 2013;Molinaro et al, 2011).…”
Section: Erp Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%