2017
DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2017.1332065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Correlates of Coherence-Break Detection During Reading of Narratives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
16
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results indicate the engagement of a particular subnetwork for processing semantic coherence, comprising the DLPFC, ventral angular gyrus, and a region in the right cerebellum (Moss and Schunn, 2015). Furthermore, as suggested by various fMRI studies, this network is particularly active in tasks when coherence needs to be resolved, in contrast with studies in which just an incoherence has to be detected (Helder et al, 2017). To resolve coherence may require the development of inferences in order to bridge gaps in meaning or information processing.…”
Section: Management Of Discourse Coherencementioning
confidence: 78%
“…The results indicate the engagement of a particular subnetwork for processing semantic coherence, comprising the DLPFC, ventral angular gyrus, and a region in the right cerebellum (Moss and Schunn, 2015). Furthermore, as suggested by various fMRI studies, this network is particularly active in tasks when coherence needs to be resolved, in contrast with studies in which just an incoherence has to be detected (Helder et al, 2017). To resolve coherence may require the development of inferences in order to bridge gaps in meaning or information processing.…”
Section: Management Of Discourse Coherencementioning
confidence: 78%
“…To study coherence monitoring in more detail, fMRI studies have employed variations of the contradiction paradigm (e.g., Ferstl, Rinck, & von Cramon, 2005; Hasson, Nusbaum, & Small, 2007; Helder, van den Broek, Karlsson, & Van Leijenhorst, 2017). Two of these studies are particularly relevant for the current study.…”
Section: Division Of Labor In the Coherence-monitoring Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During reading, these regions are suggested to be important for monitoring and inferencing in complex or ambiguous situations as well as in situation-model building (Ferstl et al, 2008). Their functional division is still under debate, but it seems that the dmPFC may be particularly important for coherence monitoring (e.g., Ferstl et al, 2005; Hasson et al, 2007; Helder et al, 2017), whereas the precuneus/PCC may play a crucial role in building and updating the mental representation (e.g., Speer, Reynolds, Swallow, & Zacks, 2009).…”
Section: Division Of Labor In the Coherence-monitoring Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected nine regions of interest (ROIs) which were found to be involved in speech production (Xu et al, 2005 ; Hampson et al, 2006 ; Newman et al, 2013 ; Bourguignon, 2014 ; Christodoulou et al, 2014 ; Hirshorn et al, 2014 ; Helder et al, 2017 ) and reduced in MCI and AD pathology (Tondelli et al, 2012 ; Wang et al, 2015 ; Dicks et al, 2018 ; Verfaillie et al, 2018 ): the IFG (the sum of the pars opercularis, pars triangularis and pars orbitalis), the Middle Frontal Gyrus (MFG), the Precuneus (Prec), the IPL (the sum of the Angular Gyrus and the Supra Marginal Gyrus), the ITG, the MTG, the planum temporale in the STG, the FFG, and the Cereb. The volumes of these regions were extracted from FreeSurfer cortical segmentation statistical output.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These regions together are thought to play a central role in sentence and discourse level comprehension processes and control, particularly in turn-ending anticipation (Magyari et al, 2014 ). Other regions reported to be associated with working memory and executive function in speech processing and production include the precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex and the cerebellum (Cereb; Xu et al, 2005 ; Hampson et al, 2006 ; Newman et al, 2013 ; Bourguignon, 2014 ; Christodoulou et al, 2014 ; Hirshorn et al, 2014 ; Helder et al, 2017 ). Increased activation of these two regions together with the IFG, MTG, and IPL have been related to working memory capacity in sentence reading and comprehension, potentially reflecting the additional working memory demand that emerges at the sentential/discourse level (Xu et al, 2005 ; Prat et al, 2007 ; Newman et al, 2013 ; Helder et al, 2017 ; De Looze et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%