Neural correlates of belief-bias reasoning under time pressure: A near-infrared spectroscopy study

Tsujii, Takeo; Watanabe, Shigeru

doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.026

Cited by 44 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 59 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…15,16 Recently, new neuroscientific evidence has emerged which suggests that the right inferior frontal cortex (IFC) plays a role in minimizing belief bias. 17 However, activation of the right IFC takes time. The researchers found that when activation of the right IFC was restricted by time pressure, the heuristic system could not be inhibited, which resulted in mistakes.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Time Pressure Have a Negative Effect on Diagnostic Accuracy?

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Time Pressure Have a Negative Effect on Diagnostic Accuracy?

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…fNIRS technology supports fast acquisition of data from numerous positions (Ehlis et al, 2005; Huppert et al, 2006; Sitaram et al, 2009). In their NIRS time pressure study, Tsujii and Watanabe (2010) noted activity in the prefrontal cortex (IFC), which demonstrates that fNIRS may provide a good measurement for studies having similar research questions. Tsujii and Watanabe's study (2010) can easily be transferred to neuroeconomic research questions—for example, regarding managers' strategic decision making under time pressure, as well as consumers' decision making under time restrictions.…”

Section: Decision On the Suitability Of Fnirs Methodology For Studyinmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In their NIRS time pressure study, Tsujii and Watanabe (2010) noted activity in the prefrontal cortex (IFC), which demonstrates that fNIRS may provide a good measurement for studies having similar research questions. Tsujii and Watanabe's study (2010) can easily be transferred to neuroeconomic research questions—for example, regarding managers' strategic decision making under time pressure, as well as consumers' decision making under time restrictions. Therefore, this relatively high temporal resolution of fNIRS shows a strong potential for fNIRS methodological investigations regarding time restrictions and limitations in economic settings.…”

Section: Decision On the Suitability Of Fnirs Methodology For Studyinmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies transferable to decision making studies from strategic management and consumer research perspectives: NIRS studies about decision making under time pressure (Tsujii and Watanabe, 2010) and about decision-making processes investigating approach-avoidance theories (Ernst et al, 2013) are highly relevant for strategic managerial decision making, as well as for consumer decision making (e.g., buying decisions under time pressure). Management studies from various areas such as innovation management research (e.g., Dayan and Elbanna, 2011) and strategic management research (e.g., Sandler-Smith and Shely, 2004) focus on managers' intuitive decisions and “gut feelings” under time pressure.…”

Section: Literature Review Of Nirs Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) as a new tool for neuroeconomic research

Kopton¹,

Kenning²

2014

Front. Hum. Neurosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the last decade, the application of neuroscience to economic research has gained in importance and the number of neuroeconomic studies has grown extensively. The most common method for these investigations is fMRI. However, fMRI has limitations (particularly concerning situational factors) that should be countered with other methods. This review elaborates on the use of functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) as a new and promising tool for investigating economic decision making both in field experiments and outside the laboratory. We describe results of studies investigating the reliability of prototype NIRS studies, as well as detailing experiments using conventional and stationary fNIRS devices to analyze this potential. This review article shows that further research using mobile fNIRS for studies on economic decision making outside the laboratory could be a fruitful avenue helping to develop the potential of a new method for field experiments outside the laboratory.

show abstract

“…Most of the work carried out was on the belief-bias effect in syllogistic reasoning tasks. [18][19][20][21][22] Neuroimaging research conducted in this field with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) suggests that different anatomical regions in the brain are responsible for the two distinct reasoning systems. The question is, however, to what extent logical reasoning, required for solving syllogisms, is similar to knowledge-based reasoning, required for the diagnosis of clinical cases.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evidence supporting dual‐process theory of medical diagnosis: a functional near‐infrared spectroscopy study

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which the dual‐process theory of medical diagnosis enjoys neuroscientific support. To that end, the study explored whether neurological correlates of system‐2 thinking could be located in the brain. It was hypothesised that system‐2 thinking could be observed as the activation of the prefrontal cortex. Method An experimental paradigm was applied that consisted of a learning and a test phase. During the learning phase, 22 medical students were trained in diagnosing chest X‐rays. Four of these eight cases were presented repeatedly, to develop a high level of expertise for these cases. During the test phase, all eight cases were presented and the participants’ prefrontal cortex was scanned using functional near‐infrared spectroscopy. Response time and diagnostic accuracy were recorded as behavioural indicators. Results The results revealed that participants’ diagnostic accuracy in the test phase was significantly higher for the trained cases as compared with the untrained cases (F[1, 21] = 138.80, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.87). Also, their response time was significantly shorter for these cases (F[1, 21] = 18.12, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.46). Finally, the results revealed that only for the untrained cases, could a significant activation of the anterolateral prefrontal cortex be observed (F[1, 21] = 21.00, p < 0.01, η2 = 0.34). Conclusion The fact that only untrained cases triggered higher levels of blood oxygenation in the prefrontal cortex is an indication that system‐2 thinking is a cognitive process distinct from system 1. Implications of these findings for the validity of the dual‐process theory are discussed.

show abstract

Neural correlates of belief-bias reasoning under time pressure: A near-infrared spectroscopy study

Cited by 44 publications

References 59 publications

Does Time Pressure Have a Negative Effect on Diagnostic Accuracy?

Does Time Pressure Have a Negative Effect on Diagnostic Accuracy?

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) as a new tool for neuroeconomic research

Evidence supporting dual‐process theory of medical diagnosis: a functional near‐infrared spectroscopy study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About