2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(00)00224-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural correlates of auditory stream segregation in primary auditory cortex of the awake monkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

38
236
4
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
38
236
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Single-and multi-unit recordings: the neural "micro-mechanisms" of auditory streaming in the primary auditory cortex 2.1. Frequency selectivity and forward suppression in A1 are consistent with the dependence of streaming on frequency separation and inter-tone interval Although some hints of a possible relationship between neural responses to temporal sound sequences in A1 and sequential streaming can be found in earlier work (e.g., Brosch and Schreiner, 1997), the first published study devoted specifically to this question was performed by Fishman et al (2001). These authors recorded ensemble neural activity (i.e., multi-unit activity and current-source density) in response to repeating sequences of alternatingfrequency tones (ABAB...) in A1 of awake macaques.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Single-and multi-unit recordings: the neural "micro-mechanisms" of auditory streaming in the primary auditory cortex 2.1. Frequency selectivity and forward suppression in A1 are consistent with the dependence of streaming on frequency separation and inter-tone interval Although some hints of a possible relationship between neural responses to temporal sound sequences in A1 and sequential streaming can be found in earlier work (e.g., Brosch and Schreiner, 1997), the first published study devoted specifically to this question was performed by Fishman et al (2001). These authors recorded ensemble neural activity (i.e., multi-unit activity and current-source density) in response to repeating sequences of alternatingfrequency tones (ABAB...) in A1 of awake macaques.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Microelectrode studies in animals provide clear evidence for forward suppression at a neuronal level in auditory cortex (Calford and Semple, 1995;Brosch and Schreiner, 1997;Fishman et al, 2001Fishman et al, , 2004Kanwal et al, 2003;Ulanovsky et al, 2003;Klump, 2004, 2005;Wehr and Zador, 2005). Much of the data illustrates frequency-dependent suppression, with a greater effect of one tone on subsequent ones when the tones are close in frequency than when they are far apart.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present findings indicate a more broadly distributed sensitivity to f 0 that may reflect neuronal sensitivity to the differing temporal properties of tones of different f 0 , rather than a sensitivity to pitch per se. Frequency-selective forward suppression of neural responses in the auditory cortex (or the equivalent in nonmammalian species) has been proposed to play an essential role in auditory streaming (Fishman et al, 2001(Fishman et al, , 2004Kanwal et al, 2003;Klump, 2004, 2005;Micheyl et al, 2005Micheyl et al, , 2007. Specifically, it has been suggested that whether a sequence of pure tones is perceived as a single coherent stream or as two separate streams depends on the degree to which one tone influences the responses to subsequent tones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past decade, several studies have investigated single-or multi-unit neural correlates of auditory streaming in mammals (Fishman et al 2001;Kanwal et al 2003;Fishman et al 2004;Micheyl et al 2005a;Pressnitzer et al 2008;Elhilali et al 2009), birds (Bee and Klump 2004Itatani and Klump 2009;Bee et al 2010), and even insects (Schul and Sheridan 2006). While these studies have identified putative neural mechanisms of auditory streaming, their conclusions have so far been limited by the lack of behavioral measures concomitant to the neural recordings.…”
Section: Possible Applications To Behavioral and Neurophysiological Smentioning
confidence: 99%