2009
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Correlates of Appetite and Hunger-Related Evaluative Judgments

Abstract: How much we desire a meal depends on both the constituent foods and how hungry we are, though not every meal becomes more desirable with increasing hunger. The brain therefore needs to be able to integrate hunger and meal properties to compute the correct incentive value of a meal. The present study investigated the functional role of the amygdala and the orbitofrontal cortex in mediating hunger and dish attractiveness. Furthermore, it explored neural responses to dish descriptions particularly susceptible to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Albeit at a lower statistical threshold, women showed significantly greater activation within the insula to the high-calorie foods, whereas men showed significantly greater activation of the amygdala in response to the same stimuli. Because the insula has been implicated in feelings of hunger, visceral sensations, and evaluation of current need states [12,23], this finding raises the possibility that women may perceive food as a particularly salient stimulus that activates a spectrum of somatic sensations and associated cognitions. Men, in contrast, activated the amygdala, a more primal limbic structure involved in detecting biologically relevant stimuli and determining the appetitive value or attractiveness of food [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Albeit at a lower statistical threshold, women showed significantly greater activation within the insula to the high-calorie foods, whereas men showed significantly greater activation of the amygdala in response to the same stimuli. Because the insula has been implicated in feelings of hunger, visceral sensations, and evaluation of current need states [12,23], this finding raises the possibility that women may perceive food as a particularly salient stimulus that activates a spectrum of somatic sensations and associated cognitions. Men, in contrast, activated the amygdala, a more primal limbic structure involved in detecting biologically relevant stimuli and determining the appetitive value or attractiveness of food [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on prior evidence that women tend to express greater food-related concerns [10,11] and higher prevalence rates for eating disorders [8,9], it was hypothesized that females would show greater overall activation in response to high-calorie food images, particularly within prefrontal inhibitory and self-monitoring regions compared to males. Furthermore, given the importance of the insula in hunger and visceral sensations [12] and the amygdala in food-related processing [1,2,5,12], it was hypothesized that women would show greater activation than men within these specific regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has previously been explained by arguing that passively viewing pictures may not be rewarding enough to elicit a striatal response, i.e., for striatal activation actual reward receipt or anticipation to a real impending reward is required (Piech et al, 2009). However, the results of this meta-analysis suggest that the mere sight of food can elicit a striatal response, albeit only in response to high (versus low) energy foods.…”
Section: Striatummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, animal work suggests that the response of certain taste neurons in the amygdala is inhibited when the taste stimulus is selfadministered, but not when delivery is imposed by an experimenter (Fontanini et al, 2009), as was the case in our study. While on the one hand the amygdala has been reported to encode the significance of (food) stimuli (Arana et al, 2003;LaBar et al, 2001;Pelchat et al, 2004;Piech et al, 2009), on the other hand it has been shown to encode stimulus intensity but not valence for odor (Anderson et al, 2003;Royet et al, 2003) and taste (Small et al, 2003a) stimuli. Our finding that the amygdala deactivates in response to an energycontaining drink while it activates in response to a non-caloric drink warrants further research.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%