visualized with an epifluorescence microscopy. Figure 1B shows the location of recording probes along with the two main structures of the auditory forebrain: field L2 and Caudomedial Nidopallium (NCM). Statistical Analyses. In the analysis using surprise index (SI), each sample is one site/unit and different statistical tests were used for comparisons based on MUA and SUA data. For MUA, we performed within-subject comparisons because comparisons are mostly within the same group of electrodes; for SUA, we performed between-subject comparisons because spike sorting was done separately for different experimental conditions and units from different conditions cannot be guaranteed to be the same. For within-subject comparisons, we used the paired sample t-test; for between-subject comparisons, we used the independent sample t-test; for comparisons with hypothesized population means, we used the one sample t-test. When the normality assumption was not met (Shapiro-Wilk test), corresponding non-parametric statistical tests (Wilcoxon test and Mann Whitney U-test) were used. The significance level was set at 0.05 (Bonferroni adjusted p-values were reported in the context oddball analysis using SI as 7 comparisons were conducted). Because we did not find any significant differences between the left and right hemisphere (t = 0.044, p = 0.965; generalized linear mixed model, with hemisphere as fixed effects and other factors as random effects), results were pooled together in all analyses. All analyses were conducted using customized scripts in Spike2, Matlab, R, and Python.