2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Control of Hand Muscles During Prehension

Abstract: In the past two decades a large number of studies have successfully characterized important features of the kinetics and kinematics of object grasping and manipulation, providing significant insight into how the Central Nervous System (CNS) controls the hand, one of the most complex motor systems, in a variety of behaviors. In this chapter we briefly review studies of hand kinematics and kinetics and highlight their major findings and open questions. The major focus of this chapter is on the neural control of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These features are in accord with the concept of a common, frequency-modulated neural input to the MN population (De Luca and Erim 1994;see also DeLuca and Contessa 2012;De Luca and Erim 2002;Farina et al 2013;Farmer et al 1993;Johnston et al 2005Johnston et al , 2009Laine and Bailey 2011;Marsden et al 1999;Rose and Knight 2011;Semmler et al 1997;Winges et al 2008). As indicated by our analyses, the strength of the modulation synchrony is not related to the force level and the frequency of the force variations or, equivalently, to the level and frequency of the oscillatory common input.…”
Section: Mu Firing Modulations and Underlying Neural Inputsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…These features are in accord with the concept of a common, frequency-modulated neural input to the MN population (De Luca and Erim 1994;see also DeLuca and Contessa 2012;De Luca and Erim 2002;Farina et al 2013;Farmer et al 1993;Johnston et al 2005Johnston et al , 2009Laine and Bailey 2011;Marsden et al 1999;Rose and Knight 2011;Semmler et al 1997;Winges et al 2008). As indicated by our analyses, the strength of the modulation synchrony is not related to the force level and the frequency of the force variations or, equivalently, to the level and frequency of the oscillatory common input.…”
Section: Mu Firing Modulations and Underlying Neural Inputsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore we hypothesized that subjects would employ significantly different digit forces as a function of wrist angle. Preliminary results of this study have been published as an abstract [18] and as part of a book chapter [12]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of single motor units of hand muscles have revealed correlated neural drive to motor neuron pools of intrinsic [16] and extrinsic [9,12,13,14,24,25] hand muscles as well as to both sets of hand muscles [26]. Analysis of correlated variability in multi-unit EMG amplitude of hand muscles has further revealed diffused, broad co-activation of intrinsic and extrinsic hand muscles [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to sensory loss, the changes in somatosensory feedback due to varied wrist posture impacts muscle coherence across intrinsic and extrinsic muscles [31]. Furthermore, extrinsic muscles were found to have a stronger coherence than the intrinsic muscles [32,33]. The lower coherence has been interpreted as a benefit for intrinsic muscle function [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%