2017
DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa80bd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural control of finger movement via intracortical brain–machine interface

Abstract: Objective Intracortical brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) are a promising source of prosthesis control signals for individuals with severe motor disabilities. Previous BMI studies have primarily focused on predicting and controlling whole-arm movements; precise control of hand kinematics, however, has not been fully demonstrated. Here, we investigate the continuous decoding of precise finger movements in rhesus macaques. Approach In order to elicit precise and repeatable finger movements, we have developed a n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All experimental tasks were performed in compliance with NIH guidelines as well as the University of Michigan's Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee and Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine. We trained two male rhesus macaques, Monkey W and Monkey N, to use a novel manipulandum, designed to isolate finger movements (Figure 1B ), in order to match fingertip position targets in the same virtual environment described in previous work (Irwin et al, 2017 ). The manipulandum consists of two "doors" with dividers to isolate index finger movements from MRP movements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All experimental tasks were performed in compliance with NIH guidelines as well as the University of Michigan's Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee and Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine. We trained two male rhesus macaques, Monkey W and Monkey N, to use a novel manipulandum, designed to isolate finger movements (Figure 1B ), in order to match fingertip position targets in the same virtual environment described in previous work (Irwin et al, 2017 ). The manipulandum consists of two "doors" with dividers to isolate index finger movements from MRP movements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier NHP studies have established that M1 may contain enough information to distinguish between individual finger movements (Hamed et al, 2007 ; Aggarwal et al, 2008 ). In our previous NHP work, we characterized the flex-extend motion of all four fingers together as a single DOF, and used signals from M1 to provide subjects with online continuous control of a virtual hand (Irwin et al, 2017 ). Here we have developed a novel manipulandum to track and control movement of two separate finger groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a strong mathematical and theoretical justification for using a KF to estimate motor intent [8]. KFs have been used for decoding motor intent previously [9], [10]. Our group has also previously reported on the use of a KF for estimating motor intent from neural recordings offline [11], [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, there are three locations where motor control signals can be intercepted: the brain [2,22,26,70], muscles [10,11,18,28,33], and peripheral nerves [1,8,27,46,53]. While cortical decoding techniques with implanted microelectrode arrays in the brain have pioneered the research field for many years, it remains unclear if there could be sufficient neural information harvested to meaningfully restore the lost motor function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%