2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural computing modeling of the reference crop evapotranspiration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, ANNs have intensively been applied in forest and agriculture hydrology, e.g., in estimating evapotranspiration (Kumar et al 2002, Adeloye et al 2012, Huo et al 2012, trunk sap flow (Liu et al 2009) and transpiration (Zee 2001a, 2001b, Vrugt et al 2002, Garcia-Santos 2007, Meijun et al 2007). In forest management, ANNs have also been applied to estimate tree volume (Gorgens et al 2009, Silva et al 2009, Diamantopoulou & Milios 2010, Özçelik et al 2010, Yu & Jia-Yin 2012, growth modeling (Castro et al 2013), tree height (Binoti et al 2013a), and to describe diameter distribution (Leite et al 2011, Binoti et al 2013b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, ANNs have intensively been applied in forest and agriculture hydrology, e.g., in estimating evapotranspiration (Kumar et al 2002, Adeloye et al 2012, Huo et al 2012, trunk sap flow (Liu et al 2009) and transpiration (Zee 2001a, 2001b, Vrugt et al 2002, Garcia-Santos 2007, Meijun et al 2007). In forest management, ANNs have also been applied to estimate tree volume (Gorgens et al 2009, Silva et al 2009, Diamantopoulou & Milios 2010, Özçelik et al 2010, Yu & Jia-Yin 2012, growth modeling (Castro et al 2013), tree height (Binoti et al 2013a), and to describe diameter distribution (Leite et al 2011, Binoti et al 2013b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variables used in the analyses are summarised in Table 1, and those identified as being significantly related to the measures of stability, by either LMM or KSOM, are shown in Table 2. The performance of KSOM in modelling measured values in terms of the correlation coefficient (R) is seen in Table 3 from which it is clear that the KSOM model could model the majority of the parameters as their R values are over 70% (very strong for uncertain environmental data, Rustum & Adeloye, 2007;Rustum et al, 2008;Adeloye et al, 2012). The KSOM model failed to successfully model the measured values for thixotropic resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The learning process takes place in between BMU and its neighboring neurons at each training iteration 't' with an aim to reduce the distance between weights and input. Kohonen self organizing map [40].…”
Section: Training the Ksommentioning
confidence: 99%