2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural compensation after early lesions: A clinical view of animal experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of regional brain volume variations in IUGR fetuses is in agreement with previous reports evaluating regional brain volumes with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)12, and brain areas calculated by sonographic biometric estimations7 in IUGR preterm neonates. Our data are also in line with the concept of reorganization of the developing human brain in the context of pathological conditions or lesions19–21.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existence of regional brain volume variations in IUGR fetuses is in agreement with previous reports evaluating regional brain volumes with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)12, and brain areas calculated by sonographic biometric estimations7 in IUGR preterm neonates. Our data are also in line with the concept of reorganization of the developing human brain in the context of pathological conditions or lesions19–21.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…There are several possible explanations for the distinct size of intracranial structures in IUGR fetuses. Studies using animal models and voxel‐based morphometry have demonstrated that early brain insults often lead to extensive neural reorganization of the gray and white brain matter, which can be expressed as an increment or reduction in specific brain areas19, 21, 29. These changes may reflect the existence of regional differences in susceptibility to brain insults19.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all cases, these neuronal differences were observed in the absence of any differences in performance. One possible explanation of this is that the same behavioural output is being achieved using different mechanisms, in line with theories discussing “neuronal compensation” in pathology (Gramsbergen, 2007; Erk et al, 2011). However, in the context of social and emotional tasks it is also possible that the mechanisms mediating behavioural output are comparable but the neuronal differences we observe reflect differences in the feelings elicited by the same category of decisions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Our findings suggest that central motor command [ie, M1; see Drew et al (15)] may remain intact after PI in adult rats, while fine-gait kinematics was altered. Several factors including mild muscular spasticity (58), abnormal activity of spinal central pattern generators (27) or aberrant motor efferent projections (25), such as the pontocerebellar tract (damaged in the present study), may have contributed to the mild locomotor dysfunctions we observed after PI.…”
Section: Impact Of Pi On Motor Function and Cortexmentioning
confidence: 62%