1999
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.19-04-01508.1999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Coding of Sound Frequency by Cricket Auditory Receptors

Abstract: Crickets provide a useful model to study neural processing of sound frequency. Sound frequency is one parameter that crickets use to discriminate between conspecific signals and sounds made by predators, yet little is known about how frequency is represented at the level of auditory receptors. In this paper, we study the physiological properties of auditory receptor fibers (ARFs) by making single-unit recordings in the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Characteristic frequencies (CFs) of ARFs are distributed dis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(51 reference statements)
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The response ambiguity exhibited by Ormia at the category boundary (Fig.4C) may be an effect of this broad tuning: mid-range frequencies may excite both low-and highfrequency afferents, resulting in a conflicting signal and potential lack of response. This behavior contrasts with that seen in the cricket, where few ambiguous or non-responses occur at category boundary, and where tuning curves of auditory afferents are less broad than in Ormia (Imaizumi and Pollack, 1999;Ramsauer and Robert, 2000;Zaretsky and Eibl, 1978). This neural organization could allow a strong sensory signal of a relevant frequency to reliably elicit a given motor response.…”
Section: T Oceanicusmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The response ambiguity exhibited by Ormia at the category boundary (Fig.4C) may be an effect of this broad tuning: mid-range frequencies may excite both low-and highfrequency afferents, resulting in a conflicting signal and potential lack of response. This behavior contrasts with that seen in the cricket, where few ambiguous or non-responses occur at category boundary, and where tuning curves of auditory afferents are less broad than in Ormia (Imaizumi and Pollack, 1999;Ramsauer and Robert, 2000;Zaretsky and Eibl, 1978). This neural organization could allow a strong sensory signal of a relevant frequency to reliably elicit a given motor response.…”
Section: T Oceanicusmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…It receives direct input from two populations of receptor neurons (Hennig, 1988) that are sensitive to two separate frequency ranges (Imaizumi and Pollack, 1999). Since the requirements on coding and processing in these two contexts also differ (Marsat and Pollack, 2004), we first tested whether adaptation changes the response curve of the AN2 in a frequency-specific way.…”
Section: Changes Of the Response Curves In The Two Frequency Channelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the peripheral level, the mechanical system that transduces sound, the tympanum, is resonant at frequencies close to the CF (Paton et al, 1977;Larsen and Michelsen, 1978). At the next level, the auditory receptors are tuned to different frequencies, with a large number tuned to frequencies close to the CF, each with a much higher selectivity than the tympanal membrane alone (Oldfield et al, 1986;Ball et al, 1989;Larsen et al, 1989;Imaizumi and Pollack, 1999). The tuning of these two systems effectively acts as a filter set, reducing the representation of non-CF frequencies in the auditory system, making the receiver less likely to perceive heterospecific songs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%