2021
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2020.1004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural closure models for dynamical systems

Abstract: Complex dynamical systems are used for predictions in many domains. Because of computational costs, models are truncated, coarsened or aggregated. As the neglected and unresolved terms become important, the utility of model predictions diminishes. We develop a novel, versatile and rigorous methodology to learn non-Markovian closure parametrizations for known-physics/low-fidelity models using data from high-fidelity simulations. The new neural closure models augment low-fidelity models w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One way to look at this problem is as a closure R -269 problem, akin to that found in turbulence modelling. This point of view has led to recent work focusing on the formulation of closure models for time-dependent reduced order models, based on the Mori-Zwanzig formulation (Gouasmi, Parish, andDuraisamy 2017, Wang, Ripamonti and, delay-differential equations (Gupta and Lermusiaux 2021), and a substantial effort for closure models inspired by developments in fluid dynamics, reviewed by Ahmed et al (2021). This line of work is still at an early stage of development but these initial results, even if largely of a heuristic and problem-dependent nature, offer some interesting ideas for future work to improve the stability of reduced models and, as demonstrated in , enable the development of reduced order models with predictive accuracy beyond the training interval.…”
Section: R -267mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to look at this problem is as a closure R -269 problem, akin to that found in turbulence modelling. This point of view has led to recent work focusing on the formulation of closure models for time-dependent reduced order models, based on the Mori-Zwanzig formulation (Gouasmi, Parish, andDuraisamy 2017, Wang, Ripamonti and, delay-differential equations (Gupta and Lermusiaux 2021), and a substantial effort for closure models inspired by developments in fluid dynamics, reviewed by Ahmed et al (2021). This line of work is still at an early stage of development but these initial results, even if largely of a heuristic and problem-dependent nature, offer some interesting ideas for future work to improve the stability of reduced models and, as demonstrated in , enable the development of reduced order models with predictive accuracy beyond the training interval.…”
Section: R -267mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ML is trained to correct the results of the physical model by using the output of the real system as the target [313,358]. Similarly, in Residual Modelling, ML learns to model the PDM error, therefore the ML can correct the PDM output or classify its validity, as in [354,[359][360][361][362][363]. Finally, the ML can be used just as a sub-process of the PDM to evaluate one of its parameters [95,[364][365][366][367][368].…”
Section: Physics Guided Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, an emerging thrust in modern ROM closure development efforts is to incorporate machine learning (ML) models 4,[8][9][10][11][12] . The last decade has seen the growth of data-driven modeling technologies (e.g., deep neural networks).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%