2014
DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2014.29.9.1293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Changes Associated with Emotion Processing in Children Experiencing Peer Rejection: A Functional MRI Study

Abstract: This study was performed to investigate differences between children who did and did not experience peer rejection in psychological state through surveys and in emotion processing during an interpersonal stress challenge task to reflect naturalistic interpersonal face-to-face relationships. A total of 20 right-handed children, 10 to 12 yr of age, completed self-rating questionnaires inquiring about peer rejection in school, depression, and anxiety. They then underwent an interpersonal stress challenge task sim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…findings are consistent with prior research demonstrating that peer adversity predicts heightened activation in emotion processing regions of the brain in the context of negative feedback(Lee et al, 2014) and social exclusion (McIver et al, 2018; Rudolph, Miernicki, F I G U R E 3 The interactive contribution of victimization and rejection sensitivity predicting labeling accuracy for negative emotions et al, 2016; Will et al, 2016), but extend this work to suggest that victimization may compromise neural regulation of general emotional cues, as reflected in facial expressions, as well. Future work is needed, however, that involves repeated assessments of ER over time.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…findings are consistent with prior research demonstrating that peer adversity predicts heightened activation in emotion processing regions of the brain in the context of negative feedback(Lee et al, 2014) and social exclusion (McIver et al, 2018; Rudolph, Miernicki, F I G U R E 3 The interactive contribution of victimization and rejection sensitivity predicting labeling accuracy for negative emotions et al, 2016; Will et al, 2016), but extend this work to suggest that victimization may compromise neural regulation of general emotional cues, as reflected in facial expressions, as well. Future work is needed, however, that involves repeated assessments of ER over time.…”
supporting
confidence: 91%
“…Several studies on bullied adolescents have documented important findings with respect to criterion C1—preoccupation with threat, or impaired capacity to perceive threat, including misreading of safety and danger cues, including hostile attributions ( 84 ), distressing paranoid thinking and subsequent misappraisal of threat ( 85 ), and biased interpretations of social situations and the intentions of others ( 86 ). fMRI studies have found that peer victimization is associated with increased neural response to being socially excluded ( 87 89 ), greater activation than controls in the amygdala, orbitofrontal cortex, and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex when viewing video clips of facial expressions that depicted negative interpersonal feedback ( 90 ), and thicker cortex in the fusiform gyrus compared to children who were not bullied by their peers [see review by Vaillancourt and Palamarchuk ( 50 )].…”
Section: Proposed Criteria For a Developmental Trauma Diagnosis And Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stimulation of the vlPFC with transcranial direct stimulation during social exclusion dampens distress (Riva et al, 2015). Children who are habitually excluded by their peers show more lateral prefrontal cortex (lPFC) activity in the face of social stress (Will et al, 2016) and when resisting risky behaviors (Telzer et al, 2017), and show greater vlPFC activation when receiving negative social feedback than do children who are not peer-rejected (Lee et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%