The Wiley Handbook on the Cognitive Neuroscience of Addiction 2015
DOI: 10.1002/9781118472415.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Neural Bases of Addiction‐Related Impairments in Response Inhibition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 157 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that poorer inhibitory control was indirectly associated with greater cannabis consumption and CUD symptoms through both increased O max and intensity, and poorer working memory was indirectly associated with greater cannabis consumption and greater CUD symptoms through lower elasticity. Our findings are consistent with previous studies demonstrating that poorer EFs are a risk factor for heavy cannabis use and CUD (Castellanos-Ryan & Conrod, 2020; Castellanos-Ryan et al, 2017; Cavalli et al, 2022; Squeglia et al, 2014) and substance use more broadly (Castellanos-Ryan & Conrod, 2020; Garavan et al, 2015; Koob & Volkow, 2010), extending this research by providing initial evidence for the role of cannabis demand as a potential mechanism in this link.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found that poorer inhibitory control was indirectly associated with greater cannabis consumption and CUD symptoms through both increased O max and intensity, and poorer working memory was indirectly associated with greater cannabis consumption and greater CUD symptoms through lower elasticity. Our findings are consistent with previous studies demonstrating that poorer EFs are a risk factor for heavy cannabis use and CUD (Castellanos-Ryan & Conrod, 2020; Castellanos-Ryan et al, 2017; Cavalli et al, 2022; Squeglia et al, 2014) and substance use more broadly (Castellanos-Ryan & Conrod, 2020; Garavan et al, 2015; Koob & Volkow, 2010), extending this research by providing initial evidence for the role of cannabis demand as a potential mechanism in this link.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Indeed, prospective studies have found that poorer EFs during early adolescence predict earlier cannabis use initiation and greater cannabis use frequency in late adolescence and early adulthood (Castellanos-Ryan et al, 2017; Cavalli et al, 2022; Squeglia et al, 2014). This is consistent with the broader substance use literature suggesting that poorer EFs (and especially inhibitory control) confer an increased risk of substance use initiation, escalation to hazardous substance use, and continuation of substance use despite negative consequences (Castellanos-Ryan & Conrod, 2020; Garavan et al, 2015; Khurana et al, 2013; Koob & Volkow, 2010). Further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms by which EFs may be associated with cannabis use and CUD.…”
Section: The Present Studysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Response inhibition, which is the ability to suppress prepotent, inappropriate responses to stimuli, thoughts, or emotions, is critical for successfully carrying out everyday tasks [25], and is considered one of the canonical components of executive control processing. When the stimulus, thought, or emotion to which a response needs to be inhibited must be simultaneously rehearsed in working memory, then inhibitory difficulty increases markedly, presumably because response inhibition and working memory compete for the allocation of common neural substrates [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%