2018
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/6kmav
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NetworkToolbox: Methods and Measures for Brain, Cognitive, and Psychometric Network Analysis in R

Abstract: This article introduces the NetworkToolbox package for R. Network analysis offers an intuitive perspective on complex phenomena via models depicted by nodes (variables) and edges (correlations). The ability of networks to model complexity has made them the standard approach for modeling the intricate interactions in the brain. Similarly, networks have become an increasingly attractive model for studying the complexity of psychological and psychopathological phenomena. NetworkToolbox aims to provide psychologic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This produced two 12 × 12 correlation matrices for each subject - one per task. We computed three measures to compare background connectivity between episodic encoding and retrieval within each subject: (1) Modularity, reflecting the degree to which our regions were operating as distinct networks, computed using the Louvain algorithm from R’s NetworkToolbox (Christensen, 2018). This method calculates a global modularity value (Q), reflecting the degree to which a set of ROIs are operating as a compartmentalized structure based on their covariation in activity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This produced two 12 × 12 correlation matrices for each subject - one per task. We computed three measures to compare background connectivity between episodic encoding and retrieval within each subject: (1) Modularity, reflecting the degree to which our regions were operating as distinct networks, computed using the Louvain algorithm from R’s NetworkToolbox (Christensen, 2018). This method calculates a global modularity value (Q), reflecting the degree to which a set of ROIs are operating as a compartmentalized structure based on their covariation in activity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome the loss of information given by spurious associations, we used the Triangulated Maximally Filtered Graph ( TMFG—Massara et al 2016 ) method which, in the construction of a sub-network, is able to remove spurious connections and retain high correlations within the original graph ( see Kenett et al 2011 ). The TMFG filtering method was applied using the ‘NetworkToolbox’ package ( Christensen 2019 ; Kenett et al 2014 ) in R ( Rstudio Team 2020 ). Finally, we further binarized each group-similarity network in order to obtain in output an unweighted, undirected network.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following network parameters were calculated for each network using the SemNeT ( Christensen and Kenett 2019 ) and NetworkToolbox ( Christensen 2019 ) packages in R: the clustering coefficient (CC) ( Watts and Strogatz 1998 ) the average shortest path length (ASPL), the modularity index (Q) ( Newman 2006 ), and the small-world-ness measure (S) ( Humphries and Gurney 2008 ). Based on previous studies ( Borodkin et al 2016 ; Christensen et al 2018 ; Kenett et al 2014 ), we empirically examined the validity of our findings by applying two reciprocal approaches.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This produced two 12x12 correlation matrices for each subject one per task. We computed 3 measures to compare background connectivity between episodic encoding and retrieval within each subject: 1) Modularity, reflecting the degree to which our regions were operating as distinct networks, computed using the Louvain algorithm from R's NetworkToolbox (Christensen, 2018) . This method calculates a global modularity value (Q), reflecting the degree to which a set of ROIs are operating as a compartmentalized structure based on their covariation in activity.…”
Section: Task Background Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%