Networks of entrepreneurs driving the Triple Helix: two cases of the Dutch energy system

Abstract

Entrepreneurs are often envisioned as small private start-up firms operating against all odds. Here, we investigate how in the context of the Triple Helix various entrepreneurs form communities and drive institutional and technological change. To theoretically shape a socialized view of entrepreneurship, we use the Triple Helix approach. Our empirical basis is a highly regulated sector driven by various agents, i. e. the Dutch energy system. As it depends very much on natural gas and relies less on renewables compared to similar countries, we analyse two cases where entrepreneurs drove the uptake of renewable energy sources. In our paper, we investigate how entrepreneurs from the private, public and academic sectors drive the evolution of the Triple Helix. From our results, two general features of entrepreneurship in the Triple Helix emerge. First of all, private stand-alone enterprises do not mirror entrepreneurs at large. Second, networks of various entrepreneurs are much more common and much more complex than usually anticipated. More specifically, we find that there are rather divergent developments in Dutch energy systems. Whereas in the case of Aardwarmte Den Haag, a number of key players collaborated in order to realize one specific technology, in the LochemEnergie case, we see a project-to-project approach supported by subsidies. In both cases, a variety of entrepreneurs from the private, public and academic sectors with different roles, goals, incentives, resources, knowledge and policy levers drive the development of their energy system. It depends on the actual situation on who has the incentives and resources to be in charge and act and to include others when it seems necessary. Entrepreneurs in such a set-up require particular skills including the ability to engage with their (knowledge) network, identify gaps, attract new participants and motivate the new and existing participants. Entrepreneurs managing these networks handle a whole range of semi-unpredictable actors and environmental factors that also influence each other; therefore, they can be defined as truly complex sociotechnological systems. As the development of local energy initiatives unfold along the way, entrepreneurs have to be flexible and open to organizational change. While large organizations such as municipalities or large multinational companies are usually less flexible, they might create space for smaller entrepreneurial activities by supporting individuals, start-ups or academics in finding novel solutions. At the same time, a major role for public entrepreneurs lies in stimulating and subsidizing entrepreneurs and their networks. The analytical framework provided here can be used to study the principles of the Triple Helix concept in a dynamic environment in which technological innovation requires the expertise and capabilities of multiple types of actors. Its function is not only to identify roles and types of entrepreneurs and their incentives, but to also assess which resources (knowledge, skills, subsidies) they ...

Academic institutional entrepreneurs in Germany: navigating and shaping multi-level research commercialization governance

“…Studies on the individual level have often been limited to the typology of roles of scientific entrepreneurs (Etzkowitz 1997); how they respond to incentives for AE and how effective they are (Siegel et al 2004); what they perceive as barriers to knowledge commercialization (D'Este and Patel 2007;Lockett et al 2003); what is the likelihood of bypassing technology transfer offices (Huyghe et al 2016); what are the determinants of academic engagement including formal commercial activities, informal commercial activities and non-commercial activities (Abreu and Grinevich 2013); the stages of academic entrepreneurial process (Tijssen 2006) or motivations to engage in AE (Balven et al 2018;Fochler 2016;Lam 2011;Thursby and Thursby 2005;Rizzo 2015;Rosa and Dawson 2006;de Silva 2012). Particularly for the context of Germany, the role of scientists in engaging in AE has often been depicted as rather passive and inert to the top-down attempts of establishing the "third mission" (Krücken 2003;Wentland et al 2012) or as not being aware of the technology transfer structures in their research organisations (Goel and Göktepe-Hulten 2017).…”

The work in progress of a developing nation’s Triple Helix and its impact on patent commercialization. The case of Sri Lanka

“…To be relevant and supportive of the third mandate, the academic structure needs to ensure it does not hinder the process of commercialisation (Litan et al, 2007). The third mandate necessitates increased involvement in terms of joint research activities and transfers of technology to industry through spin-offs, start-ups, licensing and academic entrepreneurship, sharing infrastructure in terms of laboratory facilities and R&D consultancy (Wood, 2011;Werker et al, 2017). All these activities lead to strengthening the collaboration between Academia and Industry.…”

Global Value Chain Upgrading and Business-academia Collaborations: Case Studies of Successful Innovators

“…The agency has agreed with an international Although the results remain to be seen, there are several success factors behind the launch of IPA initiative. First, the availability of public entrepreneurs (Werker et al 2017) is the most crucial one. The IPA initiative was launched by the internal team responsible for GBS at Invest Lithuania together with participants of a one-year public service programme Create Lithuania that may be broadly defined as a public entrepreneurship initiative.…”