2014
DOI: 10.1177/0895904814556753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Networks in New York City

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to report findings from an exploratory study of the early implementation of the Common Core Learning Standards in New York City by a sample of charter management organizations (CMOs) and Children First Networks (CFNs). Using the existing literature on policy implementation-specifically the concepts of boundary spanners and mutual adaptation-this research investigated the role of networks as they facilitated the implementation of the new standards. We conducted in-depth interviews w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For educational policy and practice, this study also has several implications. First, in the past years, the government and policies have endowed individual schools with greater independence and autonomy instead of imposing top-down mandates (Sliwka, 2003; Wohlstetter et al, 2015). Nevertheless, it must be realized that interdependence is as essential as independence even in a competitive educational system (Ainscow et al, 2016; Armstrong and Ainscow, 2018).…”
Section: Discussion and Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For educational policy and practice, this study also has several implications. First, in the past years, the government and policies have endowed individual schools with greater independence and autonomy instead of imposing top-down mandates (Sliwka, 2003; Wohlstetter et al, 2015). Nevertheless, it must be realized that interdependence is as essential as independence even in a competitive educational system (Ainscow et al, 2016; Armstrong and Ainscow, 2018).…”
Section: Discussion and Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to “the complexity of the work of education and the wide variability in outcomes that our systems currently produce” (Bryk, 2015: 467), school-to-school collaboration has become increasingly prevalent in K-12 education across the world over recent years (Azorín and Muijs, 2017; Chapman and Hadfield, 2010; Muijs et al, 2010; Sliwka, 2003). A set of studies have discussed the policies and practices of school networks and collaboration in different educational systems such as Belgium (Feys and Devos, 2015), Chile (Pino-Yancovic et al, 2020), Germany (Schulz and Geithner, 2010), Portugal (Lima and Dâmaso, 2019), Spain (Azorín and Muijs, 2017; Díaz-Gibson et al, 2017), the United Kingdom (Chapman, 2008, 2015; Dudley, 2011; Katz and Earl, 2010; Muijs, 2008), and the United States (Bryk, 2015; Proger et al, 2017; Wells et al, 2015; Wohlstetter et al, 2003, 2015), etc. These studies have suggested that school-to-school collaboration has several advantages such as (a) exchanging ideas, knowledge, and resources, (b) providing mutual support and challenge, (c) promoting professional development, and (d) facilitating innovation (Chapman, 2015; Chapman and Muijs, 2014; Keddie, 2014; Moore and Rutherford, 2012; OECD, 2003; Pino-Yancovic et al, 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 Collaborative professionalism and change: Kenya, India and Rwanda to operate under new forms of autonomy (Wohlstetter et al, 2014;Bodilly et al, 2004).…”
Section: International Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is increasingly recognised that these Model Y-type approaches alone are not adequate for large-scale change. Challenges have been identified, including uncertainty about the ownership of responsibility, and some roles lacking legitimacy or the capacity to operate under new forms of autonomy (Wohlstetter et al, 2014;Bodilly et al, 2004).…”
Section: International Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%