The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Networking human biomarker and hazardous chemical elements from building materials: Systematic literature review and in vivo test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, many companies specializing in the construction industry recommend using products with A+ class certificates, CE markings, or construction markings B. Products with the EcoLabel ecological mark are particularly popular because there is a strive for buildings to obtain certifications such as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method), DGNB, HQE (Haute Qualité Environmentale), or WELL [ 86 , 87 ].…”
Section: Adverse Effects Of Using Waste Materials—critical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, many companies specializing in the construction industry recommend using products with A+ class certificates, CE markings, or construction markings B. Products with the EcoLabel ecological mark are particularly popular because there is a strive for buildings to obtain certifications such as LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design), BREEAM (Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method), DGNB, HQE (Haute Qualité Environmentale), or WELL [ 86 , 87 ].…”
Section: Adverse Effects Of Using Waste Materials—critical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic literature review was adopted as the research design compared to traditional reviews, allowing the authors to understand the body of knowledge in selecting papers and proposing a research model through a robust, reproducible method while linking the model with the direction of future research [11,21,22]. This process makes it possible to comprehend the research trends and determine the extent to which each country and research field currently follows these trends [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To achieve the abovementioned aim, the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) model [42] was used to conduct the systematic review. In this study, the PRISMA was conducted through four phases, as per the systematic literature review studies by Cho et al [43] and Lee et al [40]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%