2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jik.2022.100181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Networking and knowledge creation: Social capital and collaborative innovation in responding to the COVID-19 crisis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Cohesive networks of collaboration have been shown to be particularly efficient in tackling the challenges raised from this unprecedented crisis. 7 Even though the present study has some significant limitations, such as the inclusion of articles indexed in only one scientific database and the arbitrary selection of the control group of publication topics, it is indicative of the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on scientific literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…6 Cohesive networks of collaboration have been shown to be particularly efficient in tackling the challenges raised from this unprecedented crisis. 7 Even though the present study has some significant limitations, such as the inclusion of articles indexed in only one scientific database and the arbitrary selection of the control group of publication topics, it is indicative of the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on scientific literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Furthermore, the networks, ecosystems, and collaboration between businesses could be especially important during times of crisis as they may help businesses share resources and knowledge to survive in the turbulent environment [ 101 ]. In this regard, individuals in Russia's major cities – St. Petersburg and Moscow – are better positioned to weather the pandemic shock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, concrete evidence is still missing in literature as contrasting ndings are reported. For instance, positive results (Pratono 2018;Wang and Chung 2020;Al-Omoush et al, 2022) and negative ndings (Abu-Rumman et al, 2021;Ribeiro et al, 2021) have been reported in past literature. Therefore, a debate exists in the literature as to which types of networks yield bene ts to rm performance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%