2022
DOI: 10.1099/jmm.0.001555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network-wide analysis of the Serosep EntericBio Gastro Panel 2 for the detection of enteric pathogens in Public Health Wales microbiology laboratories

Abstract: Introduction. A retrospective data analysis of 34 months (spanning 2016–2020) of 961573 diagnostic results obtained before and after nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) implementation, across the Public Health Wales microbiology network. Hypothesis / Gap Statement. This is the first network-wide analysis of the implementation of enteric NAAT in diagnostic microbiology. Aim. To assess the outcome of replacing microscopy and bacterial cult… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 48 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Molecular detection and typing tools offer increased sensitivity and specificity and are essential to investigate and control Cryptosporidium transmission but are also expensive. A selection of enteric multiplex PCR panel assays (which detect Cryptosporidium along with a range of bacteria and other enteric parasites) are now commercially available and provide more cost-effective molecular screening but cannot always detect the range of Cryptosporidium species infecting humans [16], and are still too expensive for many low-income settings.…”
Section: Cryptosporidium Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular detection and typing tools offer increased sensitivity and specificity and are essential to investigate and control Cryptosporidium transmission but are also expensive. A selection of enteric multiplex PCR panel assays (which detect Cryptosporidium along with a range of bacteria and other enteric parasites) are now commercially available and provide more cost-effective molecular screening but cannot always detect the range of Cryptosporidium species infecting humans [16], and are still too expensive for many low-income settings.…”
Section: Cryptosporidium Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%