2017
DOI: 10.1109/access.2017.2747560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network Traffic Classifier With Convolutional and Recurrent Neural Networks for Internet of Things

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
272
1
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 587 publications
(302 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
272
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For network classification tasks, mixed models are reported to outperform pure LSTM or CNN models [12]. To capture both spatial and temporal features of a flow, both CNN and RNN are used in [9], [12] for different applications. Aside from minor differences, both studies take the content of the first 6 to 30 packets to the CNN model followed by a RNN or LSTM model.…”
Section: Recurrent Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For network classification tasks, mixed models are reported to outperform pure LSTM or CNN models [12]. To capture both spatial and temporal features of a flow, both CNN and RNN are used in [9], [12] for different applications. Aside from minor differences, both studies take the content of the first 6 to 30 packets to the CNN model followed by a RNN or LSTM model.…”
Section: Recurrent Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time Series+Header: Since time series features are barely affected by encryption, it has been widely applied to various applications and datasets. The first few packets, from 10 to 30 packets, are reported to be enough for classification in many datasets [8], [12]. Sampled packets from the entire flow are also shown to achieve promising accuracy [3].…”
Section: F Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While different statistical and machine learning tools have been used till now for traffic classification, e.g. refer to [16] and references herein, most of these works are dependent upon features which are either not available in encrypted traffic, or cannot be extracted in real time, e.g. port number and payload data [16,20].…”
Section: Related Work and Research Gapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experiment uses a dump of network traffic [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] with 14 different traffic type tags generated by different applications (7 for conventional encrypted traffic and 7 for VPN traffic). The quality criterion for traffic classification is the accuracy of classifying samples.…”
Section: Realization Of Network Traffic Analysis Algorithms and Expermentioning
confidence: 99%