2017
DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/aa6600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network structure of SiO2 and MgSiO3 in amorphous and liquid States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Si‐Mg pair, the first peak of the G Si–Mg (r) locates at 3.22 ± 0.01 Å. These data are consistent with the experimental data and calculated results …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the Si‐Mg pair, the first peak of the G Si–Mg (r) locates at 3.22 ± 0.01 Å. These data are consistent with the experimental data and calculated results …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Meanwhile, by using first‐principle MD simulations, Ghosh et al reported that the Mg CN is 4.6 with the average Mg‐O BL of 2.05 Å. The Si‐rich and Mg‐rich regions of the network structure were interpreted in recent MD simulations as the OSi y and OMg y clusters were determined . The distribution of corner‐ and edge‐sharing bonds in this MgSiO 3 model has been showed that the corner‐sharing bonds are major and the edge‐sharing bonds are a few ten of bonds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Si-O coordination number was fixed to 4.0 in the fit (Wilding et al 2008) ). These structural parameters are also consistent with previously reported values derived from both simulations (Lan et al 2017a;Kim et al 2019) and experimental studies (Funamori et al 2004;Wilding et al 2008) where the angled brackets denote an average over the Q-range of the data.…”
Section: Further Developmentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…At ambient pressure the calculated density of the sample is 2.52 g/cm 3 that not much larger than the real density of silica liquid. The pair radial distribution functions (PRDF) as obtained from our simulation are similar to those reported in reference [26].…”
Section: Computational Proceduressupporting
confidence: 82%