2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network structure and firm-level entrepreneurial behavior: The role of market and technological knowledge networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept that firms may be able to move away from well-established STPs by using IT and network technologies results in them being able to enjoy an increased choice in finding premises that are more suitable. This idea is supported by the work of Nikiforou et al (2020) who found that in open marketsas in the cases presented here -technological networks are equally as beneficial as physical associations.…”
Section: Regional and Geographical Aspectssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The concept that firms may be able to move away from well-established STPs by using IT and network technologies results in them being able to enjoy an increased choice in finding premises that are more suitable. This idea is supported by the work of Nikiforou et al (2020) who found that in open marketsas in the cases presented here -technological networks are equally as beneficial as physical associations.…”
Section: Regional and Geographical Aspectssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…As an actor in a coopetition network, in order to obtain more market share, firms constantly compete with other actors (Chen et al , 2019). Occupying structural hole or central position increases a firm's access to more valuable resources and information, which allows it to take more competitive actions to obtain market share (Fjeldstad et al , 2004; Nikiforou et al , 2020). Thus, our findings enrich the literature about the internal mechanism of the impact of network position on network performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural hole and centrality are unique network position advantages to enable a firm to enjoy resource advantages. The higher structural hole degree and centrality degree of a firm, the better access it will have to the resources contained in a transnational coopetition network (Lado et al , 1997; Wilhelm, 2011; Bouncken et al , 2015; Tidstrom and Rajala, 2016), and such access enables the firm to take more competitive actions, further to achieve superior network performance (Nikiforou et al , 2020). Simultaneously, in a coopetition network, structural holes can bring diversified and heterogeneous information, knowledge and resources, which will reduce the dependence of firms on partners, and which is complementary to the greater influence brought by network centrality (Burchard and Cornwell, 2018; Soda et al , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 15 presents the results of factor-driven nations where model 1M indicates that entrepreneurs are required to develop networking as it provides novel and essential information that are likely to facilitate both the firm's risk taking behavior and problem solving as well as decision making in starting a venture (Lioukas and Voudouris, 2020). Moreover, our results suggest that it is essential for aspiring entrepreneurs to develop networking along with skills and knowledge that are substantially helpful in evaluating further business opportunities to create a venture.…”
Section: Configurations Of Informal Institutions In Factor-driven Economiesmentioning
confidence: 93%