2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network structural perturbation against interlayer link prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; for GAT (Veličković et al 2018), a uv represents attention coefficients; for GraphSAGE (Hamilton, Ying, and Leskovec 2017), a uv = 1 |Nu| when using a mean aggregator. Tang et al argued that intralayer links connected with small degree nodes have the most significant impact on capturing interlayer features (Tang et al 2022). This observation might be explained from a resource allocation perspective (Zhou, Lü, and Zhang 2009).…”
Section: Cross-network Embeddingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; for GAT (Veličković et al 2018), a uv represents attention coefficients; for GraphSAGE (Hamilton, Ying, and Leskovec 2017), a uv = 1 |Nu| when using a mean aggregator. Tang et al argued that intralayer links connected with small degree nodes have the most significant impact on capturing interlayer features (Tang et al 2022). This observation might be explained from a resource allocation perspective (Zhou, Lü, and Zhang 2009).…”
Section: Cross-network Embeddingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving the effect of user alignment by reducing the semantic gap can be broken down into three aspects: (1) Accurate and comprehensive representation of user characteristics. Due to the heterogeneity between different social networks, computing user similarity based on user features and network topologies is commonly influenced by noise [9,10]. Existing methods of this kind are too biased to determine whether two users of two different social networks are the same real user by simply analyzing the users' attributes, such as age and gender.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%