2022
DOI: 10.1002/wcms.1630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network search algorithms and scoring functions for advanced‐level computerized synthesis planning

Abstract: In 2020, a "hybrid" expert-AI computer program called Chematica (a.k.a. Synthia) was shown to autonomously plan multistep syntheses of complex natural products, which remain outside the reach of purely data-driven AI programs. The ability to plan at this level of chemical sophistication has been attributed mainly to the superior quality of Chematica's reactions rules. However, rules alone are not sufficient for advanced synthetic planning which also requires appropriately crafted algorithms with which to intel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Determining the most probable sequence of reactions between two compounds is a shortest path problem. Extracting such paths in terms of a likelihood for reaction mechanisms and synthesis routes has been accomplished based on depth-first algorithms. A drawback of these approaches is that they are specifically tailored solutions for a specially constructed and pruned CRN. For example, the stoichiometric requirements of a reaction are not considered or circumvented by construction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining the most probable sequence of reactions between two compounds is a shortest path problem. Extracting such paths in terms of a likelihood for reaction mechanisms and synthesis routes has been accomplished based on depth-first algorithms. A drawback of these approaches is that they are specifically tailored solutions for a specially constructed and pruned CRN. For example, the stoichiometric requirements of a reaction are not considered or circumvented by construction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a small set of couplings under a limited range of conditions can be useful for specific applications, it is a much greater challenge to build a self-driving lab that can make molecules of arbitrary structure. However, this outstanding challenge is too complex to be addressed here and continues to see significant ongoing developments that lead to expanded capabilities. ,,, In summary, to run smoothly, a self-driving lab must be controlled by robust algorithms and code. Human cognitive capabilities can usually handle such tasks with ease; however, their automation can be very difficult.…”
Section: Challenges and Lessons Learnedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous recent review and perspective articles have extensively explored the role of data science, ML and AI in various domains of experimental chemistry, including general chemistry, 1 synthetic chemistry and chemical reactions, [2][3][4][5] as well as theoretical topics such as chemical compound space exploration 6 and force-eld development. 7,8 Additionally, recent reviews have addressed the application of autonomous research systems in materials science, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] organic chemistry, [17][18][19] inorganic chemistry, 20 porous materials, 21 nanoscience, 22,23 drug formulation 24,25 and biomaterials. 26 Reviews also exist on the topic of self-driving laboratories 27,28 and their low-cost incarnations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%