2019
DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network remodeling induced by transcranial brain stimulation: A computational model of tDCS-triggered cell assembly formation

Abstract: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a variant of noninvasive neuromodulation, which promises treatment for brain diseases like major depressive disorder. In experiments, long-lasting aftereffects were observed, suggesting that persistent plastic changes are induced. The mechanism underlying the emergence of lasting aftereffects, however, remains elusive. Here we propose a model, which assumes that tDCS triggers a homeostatic response of the network involving growth and decay of synapses. The cort… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(86 reference statements)
5
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What we show here is that network activity may have also constrained this enhancing effect. Known homeostatic plasticity mechanisms depend on neuronal firing [45], and conceivably the effects of tDCS on neuronal excitability can in principle recruit these mechanisms [46]. Regardless, network effects are likely to be less specific than the pathway specific mechanisms studied with classic plasticity induction mechanisms [12] We conclude that the specific effects of DCS will depend strongly on the endogenous network activity, which motivates future research with more realistic preparations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…What we show here is that network activity may have also constrained this enhancing effect. Known homeostatic plasticity mechanisms depend on neuronal firing [45], and conceivably the effects of tDCS on neuronal excitability can in principle recruit these mechanisms [46]. Regardless, network effects are likely to be less specific than the pathway specific mechanisms studied with classic plasticity induction mechanisms [12] We conclude that the specific effects of DCS will depend strongly on the endogenous network activity, which motivates future research with more realistic preparations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…They may include immediate and in-cascade, short- and medium-term network, synaptic, cellular, and molecular processes, including multiple plasticity processes [ 30 , 48 , 55 , 56 , 57 ]. A computational study predicts that focal stimulation can trigger new functional large-scale neural connections [ 58 ]. The effects of tDCS also depend on the state of the brain and neural systems [ 52 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efficient induction of such assemblies can provide a powerful means to trigger or suppress a specific behavior (8,11), and can potentially guide us in understanding brain diseases (12) and to design more efficient brain machine interfaces (13). As with other perturbation techniques (14)(15)(16)(17), it is crucial to understand how parameters of stimulation, including the pattern of activation of specific neurons and the general state of the network dynamics, can be optimized for an efficient induction. This optimization can, however, be complicated, given the complex connectivity and dynamics of cortical networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%