2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2005.1464950
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network-on-Chip-Centric Approach to Interleaving in High Throughput Channel Decoders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous methods and system architectures have been proposed to solve the memory conflict problem in a parallel turbo decoder [5,14,12,15,16,17]. However, there are several limitations of these approaches.…”
Section: B Solving Memory Conflict Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous methods and system architectures have been proposed to solve the memory conflict problem in a parallel turbo decoder [5,14,12,15,16,17]. However, there are several limitations of these approaches.…”
Section: B Solving Memory Conflict Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviewing on chip permutation networks (supporting either full or partial permutation) with regard to their implementation shows that most of the networks employ a packet switching mechanism to deal with the conflict of permutated data [3]- [6]. Their implementations either use first input first output (FIFO) queues for the conflicting data [3] [5] [6] or time slot allocation in the overall system with the cost of more routing stages [5] or a complex routing with a deflection technique that avoids buffering of the conflicting data [4].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their implementations either use first input first output (FIFO) queues for the conflicting data [3] [5] [6] or time slot allocation in the overall system with the cost of more routing stages [5] or a complex routing with a deflection technique that avoids buffering of the conflicting data [4]. The choices of network design factors, i.e., topology, switching technique and the routing algorithm, have different impacts on the on chip implementation.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the advances in VLSI technology, multi-processor system-on-chips with Network-on-Chip (NoC) infrastructures have been adopted to flexibly meet the requirement of computation and communication for such platforms [2,3,4,5]. One of the challenges in these NoC designs is to handle the intensive interleaving of exchanged data among the processing components [2,3,4,5]. This challenge becomes harder when the interleaving (permutation) rule, varying from one standard to another and within a single standard, even can be considered as random.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work in [2] presents the parameterization (e.g., choosing buffer depth, routing algorithm, etc.) of a general-purpose 2D-mesh packet-switched network for interleaving data, rather than an optimized network design for bandwidth-/ area-efficiencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%