2011
DOI: 10.1155/2011/676949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network Models: An Underutilized Tool in Wildlife Epidemiology?

Abstract: Although the approach of contact network epidemiology has been increasing in popularity for studying transmission of infectious diseases in human populations, it has generally been an underutilized approach for investigating disease outbreaks in wildlife populations. In this paper we explore the differences between the type of data that can be collected on human and wildlife populations, provide an update on recent advances that have been made in wildlife epidemiology by using a network approach, and discuss w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
144
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
144
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In natural systems, it has been demonstrated that these interrelated facets of transmission can vary widely between individuals. In fact, empirical studies suggest that unequal contact rates are the rule rather than the exception (Craft and Caillaud 2011), that contact rates can vary with infection-induced behavioral changes (Croft et al 2011), and that these changes are likely non-uniform across individuals (Lopes et al 2016). Innate and plastic heterogeneity in susceptibility to infection has been documented for several species (Dwyer et al 1997, Beldomenico and Begon 2010, Gibson et al 2016, and variability in infectiousness has also been observed, particularly when concomitant infections are present (Cattadori et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In natural systems, it has been demonstrated that these interrelated facets of transmission can vary widely between individuals. In fact, empirical studies suggest that unequal contact rates are the rule rather than the exception (Craft and Caillaud 2011), that contact rates can vary with infection-induced behavioral changes (Croft et al 2011), and that these changes are likely non-uniform across individuals (Lopes et al 2016). Innate and plastic heterogeneity in susceptibility to infection has been documented for several species (Dwyer et al 1997, Beldomenico and Begon 2010, Gibson et al 2016, and variability in infectiousness has also been observed, particularly when concomitant infections are present (Cattadori et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While traditionally applied to human-pathogen systems, network analysis tools have recently gained traction among ecologists studying wildlife disease dynamics [11][12][13]. Here, we present how network epidemiology can be used to develop efficient vaccination strategies for a social wildlife species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it will be essential understand the interactions between genetic diversity and sociality on parasite transmission (Hughes and Boomsma 2006;Walker and Hughes 2009;Baer and Schmid-Hempel 1999;Ugelvig et al 2010). For now, the robust empirical data on the impact of sociality on parasites outside of human diseases is lacking (Craft and Caillaud 2011).…”
Section: Individual Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%