2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2023.104266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network intervention analysis of anxiety-related outcomes and processes of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for anxious cancer survivors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This provided a stability estimate reflecting the proportion of runs in which an edge weight was nonzero. We followed the approach of Fishbein et al (2023) and focus our reporting and interpretation only on the edges between the treatment node and symptom nodes that yielded a stability estimate of .60 or greater (see Supplemental Material, for all results, including those with lower stability estimates). This approach was selected to avoid overinterpretation of results that were highly dependent on sample composition; however, it should be noted that there is no empirical research investigating optimal cut points for determining which network edges are interpreted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This provided a stability estimate reflecting the proportion of runs in which an edge weight was nonzero. We followed the approach of Fishbein et al (2023) and focus our reporting and interpretation only on the edges between the treatment node and symptom nodes that yielded a stability estimate of .60 or greater (see Supplemental Material, for all results, including those with lower stability estimates). This approach was selected to avoid overinterpretation of results that were highly dependent on sample composition; however, it should be noted that there is no empirical research investigating optimal cut points for determining which network edges are interpreted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The answers to these questions are still unknown but the first results seem promising [63,64]. Although targeting psychological symptoms and behaviors is inherently distinct from targeting genes or computer networks, recent studies [63][64][65][66][67][68] have started to reveal contrasting effects not only among different treatment modalities [65][66][67][68], but also throughout the course of treatment [63,64]. These early results suggest that achieving a remarkable level of precision in psychological treatments may be attainable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, limita�ons are related to the causal aspects in the network analysis. As stated by Fishbein et al (2023), contemporaneous changes in a NIA approach do not imply causality of mechanisms. A direct effect is hence not synonymous with a causal effect.…”
Section: Strengths Limitations and Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In recent �mes, a network analysis strategy for studying interven�on and treatment effects was proposed: Network Interven�on Analysis (NIA; (Blanken et al, 2019) Applying NIA to examine direct and indirect effects of an interven�on is an approach with mul�ple strengths. First, the approach is exploratory and does not rely on specifying a priori theore�cal mechanisms which are typically assessed in other common approaches, such as media�on analysis (Fishbein et al, 2023). Thus, mul�ple mechanis�c processes and outcomes can be examined in a single model, without the need to specify hypothe�cal pathways before analysis.…”
Section: The Network Intervention Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation