2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-014-0989-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network Influences on the Sexual Risk Behaviors of Gay, Bisexual and Other Men Who Have Sex with Men Using Geosocial Networking Applications

Abstract: Geosocial networking applications (GSN apps) have become increasingly popular among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (MSM). Our study sought to understand whether inclusion of individuals met via GSN apps in participants’ social networks was associated with increased HIV risk behaviors among a probability sample of GSN app using MSM (N=295) recruited in Los Angeles, California. Approximately 20% of participants included a GSN app-met individual as one of their top five closest social network m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
77
2
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
77
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is highly possible that using dating apps is an emerging risk factor for unsafe sexual behaviours. Previous studies found that the prevalence of having unprotected anal intercourse ranged from 17.0% [5] to 66.7% [6] in homosexual men who used dating apps. Moreover, homosexual men who used dating apps for more than one year were more likely to have unprotected anal intercourse [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is highly possible that using dating apps is an emerging risk factor for unsafe sexual behaviours. Previous studies found that the prevalence of having unprotected anal intercourse ranged from 17.0% [5] to 66.7% [6] in homosexual men who used dating apps. Moreover, homosexual men who used dating apps for more than one year were more likely to have unprotected anal intercourse [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, this research was conducted in North Carolina, which is a fairly rural state with a unique social context, and contributes to increasing our knowledge and understanding of MSM and transgender women outside of large, urban areas, such as Los Angeles, New York City, and Atlanta where most of the app-based research has been conducted [4,5,6,7,9,11,13,15,17]. Furthermore, given the rising and disproportionate HIV rates in the South and that the 14 th and 22 nd highest rates of HIV occurred in two metropolitan statistical areas in North Carolina, [1, 36] conducting research to explore HIV risk in this area is greatly needed and should be a high priority in order to address the epidemiological changes in HIV in the United States.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, partnered men have sought advice on the appropriateness of GSN app use in a serious relationship, how to approach discussions about app use with one's primary partner, and how to use these apps when partnered (Savage, 2013; Stafford, 2012). Recent data indicate that GSN app use is not uncommon among partnered MSM, with 22–28 % of men in these studies reporting being in a relationship of some kind (Holloway et al, 2015; Lehmiller & Ioerger, 2014; Rendina et al, 2014). Moreover, partnered men may be more likely than single MSM to use these apps to identify potential sexual partners (Goedel & Duncan, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, GSN app users have reported higher numbers of sexual partners (Lehmiller & Ioerger, 2014; Phillips et al, 2014; Rice et al, 2012), more lifetime diagnoses of sexually transmitted infections (Beymer et al, 2014; Lehmiller & Ioerger, 2014), and lower rates of HIV testing relative to MSM in general, but higher rates than the general population (Rendina et al, 2014). Findings regarding condomless sex with partners met through apps are equivocal, with some indicating that men may be more likely to practice safer sex with these partners (Rice et al, 2012; Winetrobe et al, 2014) and some indicating that they are less likely (Holloway, Pulsipher, Gibbs, Barman-Adhikari, & Rice, 2015). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%