1989
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(1989)115:2(131)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network Flow Algorithm Applied to California Aqueduct Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the SIMLYD-!I model, developed by Evenson and Mosely [1970], the objective of the optimization submodel is to minimize system costs, subject to constraints on releases and storages. Sigvaldason [1976] and Chung et al [1989] assigned penalty coefficients to each are in the network to prioritize the allocation of water when ideal operating con-(titions could not be achieved; this generates policies that are similar but more flexible than those generated using the U.S. It is difficult to specify an objective function that correctly values future operations; it represents a tradeoff among risks of power, energy, and water shortages at different sites at different times.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the SIMLYD-!I model, developed by Evenson and Mosely [1970], the objective of the optimization submodel is to minimize system costs, subject to constraints on releases and storages. Sigvaldason [1976] and Chung et al [1989] assigned penalty coefficients to each are in the network to prioritize the allocation of water when ideal operating con-(titions could not be achieved; this generates policies that are similar but more flexible than those generated using the U.S. It is difficult to specify an objective function that correctly values future operations; it represents a tradeoff among risks of power, energy, and water shortages at different sites at different times.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previously discussed original model is strictly a conventional mass-balance type simulation model with no mathematical programming algorithm. Chung, Archer, and DeVries (1989) describe the recent revision of DWRSIM to incorporate the outof-kilter network flow programming algorithm. The versions of DWRSIM with and without the network flow programming algorithm are used for the same types of analyses.…”
Section: Reservoir System Analysis Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This loss of generality allows the resources allocation problem to be visually and precisely displayed by the network structure, and gains in return higher computational efficiency and easier comprehension of the priority-based allocation mechanism. These characteristics have prompted model developers to incorporate NFP into many general models (Evenson and Moseley, 1970;Sigvaldason, 1976;Labadie et al, 1986;Martin, 1987;Kuczera and Diment, 1988;Brendecke, 1989;Chung et al, 1989;Andrews et al, 1992;Wurbs, 1993;Andreu et al, 1996;Yerrameddy and Wurbs, 1996;Fredericks et al, 1998;Ilich et al, 2000;Dai and Labadie, 2001;Chou and Wu, 2010). The NFP represents the physical aspect of a water resources system as a directed network G(N, L), where N is the set of n nodes and L is the set of m links.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%