2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network effects in technology acceptance: Laboratory experimental evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Past studies determined PU as a desired value realized by a consumer for the accomplishment of any task by using a new technology and/or information system, effectively and successfully (Kim et al, 2014;Venkatesh et al, 2003). Other researchers (Jan & Contreras, 2011;Kang & Lee, 2010;Lee, 2009;Merhi, 2015;Pontiggia & Virili, 2010;Sledgianowski & Kulviwat, 2009;Wu, Chen, & Lin, 2007;Yen, Wu, Cheng, & Huang, 2010) examined that the usefulness of a system in terms of user's thinking had a positive influence on adoption of social networking sites. In other studies, on Facebook adoption, PU is classified as the degree to which a user accepts (with trust) Facebook for educational purposes (Lin, Li, Califf, & Featherman, 2013;Mazman & Usluel, 2010).…”
Section: Perceived Usefulness (Pu)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past studies determined PU as a desired value realized by a consumer for the accomplishment of any task by using a new technology and/or information system, effectively and successfully (Kim et al, 2014;Venkatesh et al, 2003). Other researchers (Jan & Contreras, 2011;Kang & Lee, 2010;Lee, 2009;Merhi, 2015;Pontiggia & Virili, 2010;Sledgianowski & Kulviwat, 2009;Wu, Chen, & Lin, 2007;Yen, Wu, Cheng, & Huang, 2010) examined that the usefulness of a system in terms of user's thinking had a positive influence on adoption of social networking sites. In other studies, on Facebook adoption, PU is classified as the degree to which a user accepts (with trust) Facebook for educational purposes (Lin, Li, Califf, & Featherman, 2013;Mazman & Usluel, 2010).…”
Section: Perceived Usefulness (Pu)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TAM has been applied and investigated in many studies (Chang, 2010;Lin & Lu, 2000;Liao, Palvia, & Lin, 2006;Park, Roman, Lee, & Chung, 2009;Pontiggia & Virili, 2010;Teo, Lim, & Lai, 1999;Teo, 2001;Youngberg, Olsen, & Hauser, 2009) and continues to be explored by scholars. TAM3 synthesizes many previous studies on the TAM and proposes a theoretical framework to explain user acceptance more deeply.…”
Section: The Theoretical Background Of Tam3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the information science field, network externalities is a key factor in measuring a product's value, and word-of-mouth throughout the network represents a product's reputation. Accordingly, many researchers use network externalities and word-of-mouth effects to explain online herding behavior (Kauffman et al, 2000;Lee et al, 2009;Pontiggia and Virili, 2010;Muchnik et al, 2013). Network externalities occur when users are directly or 689 Information cascades in online reading indirectly connected in a network of relationships, experiencing growing benefits as the number of connections in the network increases (Pontiggia and Virili, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%