2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network DEA: Additive efficiency decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
108
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed out by many authors including Kao and Hwang (2008), Kao (2009), Chen et al (2009), Tone and Tsutsui (2009 and Cook et al (2010), the conventional DEA models apply a single process to evaluate the transforming efficiency of multiple inputs and outputs such that they fail to measure the efforts of different processes and sub-processes within the production systems. Thus, we cannot evaluate the impact of sub-process inefficiencies on the overall efficiency of the system as a whole.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As pointed out by many authors including Kao and Hwang (2008), Kao (2009), Chen et al (2009), Tone and Tsutsui (2009 and Cook et al (2010), the conventional DEA models apply a single process to evaluate the transforming efficiency of multiple inputs and outputs such that they fail to measure the efforts of different processes and sub-processes within the production systems. Thus, we cannot evaluate the impact of sub-process inefficiencies on the overall efficiency of the system as a whole.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example see (Sexton and Lewis, 2003;Chen and Zhu, 2004;Liang et al, 2006;Kao and Hwang, 2008;Chen et al, 2009) among others. Recently, Tone and Tsutsui (2009) and Cook et al, (2010) have proposed DEA models for measuring the efficiency of network systems connected in series with linking activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About the specification of decomposition weights, many works (e.g., Cook et al [36]) chose the endogenous weights that define the weights w p as the virtual inputs (outputs) of stage p divided by total virtual inputs (outputs), representing the relative importance or contribution of the performance of each stage, respectively, to the overall performance of the DMU in the whole process. However, Ang and Chen [37] found that these endogenous weights implied that upstream stages (regardless the stage efficiency scores) in the model would obtain higher priority in efficiency decomposition, which meant that the earlier stages would obtain higher decomposition weights and have a greater influence on the overall efficiency.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some studies proposed decomposition approach for measuring the e ciency of network struc-ture; as an instance, Chen et al developed additive e ciency decomposition approach for measuring the e ciency of two-stage network process [21], same as the study by Cook et al, which represented the overall e ciency of an open multistage process as an additive weighted average of the e ciencies of the individual components [22]. In this regard, Kao and Liu developed a multi-period e ciency measurement in DEA to calculate overall and period e ciencies of a DMU at the same time.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%