Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2012
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.86.056114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network coordination and synchronization in a noisy environment with time delays

Abstract: We study the effects of nonzero time delays in stochastic synchronization problems with linear couplings in complex networks. We consider two types of time delays: transmission delays between interacting nodes and local delays at each node (due to processing, cognitive, or execution delays). By investigating the underlying fluctuations for several delay schemes, we obtain the synchronizability threshold (phase boundary) and the scaling behavior of the width of the synchronization landscape, in some cases for a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This subset is depicted in Figure 7 along with S. One can verify that s * cot(s * ) = s2 is invertible for s2 ∈ [0.1, 0.9] and it can be expressed as s * (s2). For s1, s2 ∈ S, we choose the following class of rational functions f (s1, s2) = As 2 (s1) s 2 1 + Bs 2 (s1) s1 − s * (s2) (26) in which the enumerators Figure 11 depicts the exact function f (s1, 0.5) and the rational approximationf (s1, 0.5) for s1 ∈ S together with the associated relative error. The relative error function…”
Section: Approximation Formulas For Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This subset is depicted in Figure 7 along with S. One can verify that s * cot(s * ) = s2 is invertible for s2 ∈ [0.1, 0.9] and it can be expressed as s * (s2). For s1, s2 ∈ S, we choose the following class of rational functions f (s1, s2) = As 2 (s1) s 2 1 + Bs 2 (s1) s1 − s * (s2) (26) in which the enumerators Figure 11 depicts the exact function f (s1, 0.5) and the rational approximationf (s1, 0.5) for s1 ∈ S together with the associated relative error. The relative error function…”
Section: Approximation Formulas For Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the final step, we utilize approximation (26) and arrive at a tight approximation of the risk measureR…”
Section: Approximation Formulas For Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, n , substituting λi from equation (24) into the equation (23) yields identity (22). The lower bound of the coherency for the case that C = Mn was found using numerical analysis in [24], [25]. We found the fundamental limit for general output matrix C and studied uniqueness of the limit using convex analysis.…”
Section: Optimal and Robust Topologies Wrt Time-delaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the state-space system given by (13) and (26), the square of H 2 norm of the system is also defined by (17), in which B and M are given by (18) and (19), Z is expressed by…”
Section: B Vertex Variancementioning
confidence: 99%