2022
DOI: 10.1109/access.2022.3157876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network-Aware 5G Edge Computing for Object Detection: Augmenting Wearables to “See” More, Farther and Faster

Abstract: Advanced wearable devices are increasingly incorporating high-resolution multi-camera systems. As state-of-the-art neural networks for processing the resulting image data are computationally demanding, there has been a growing interest in leveraging fifth generation (5G) wireless connectivity and mobile edge computing for offloading this processing closer to end-users. To assess this possibility, this paper presents a detailed simulation and evaluation of 5G wireless offloading for object detection in the case… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RGB images can be uploaded to the cloud for processing, with distances, objects, and potentially feedback reported back to the App. While cloud processing requires network connectivity and bandwidth, and adds network latency, it can still be beneficial for users in terms of battery or CPU usage, accuracy, and even overall latency (e.g., 84 ms) when local systems cannot perform the same computations within a time-efficient manner [11] . Finally, it should also be noted that our results reflect the performance of approaches available at the time of testing, and that further hardware or software revisions by the developers may alter their accuracy and usability metrics in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RGB images can be uploaded to the cloud for processing, with distances, objects, and potentially feedback reported back to the App. While cloud processing requires network connectivity and bandwidth, and adds network latency, it can still be beneficial for users in terms of battery or CPU usage, accuracy, and even overall latency (e.g., 84 ms) when local systems cannot perform the same computations within a time-efficient manner [11] . Finally, it should also be noted that our results reflect the performance of approaches available at the time of testing, and that further hardware or software revisions by the developers may alter their accuracy and usability metrics in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a system holds great promise for assisting pBLV in their daily living. Future research may develop a system where the video is uploaded to an edge server for conducting all computation tasks, to further reduce the wearable system weight [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the rapid increase of devices that include vibrotactile feedback, available vibration motors do not display adequate performance metrics for several critical haptics applications. In particular, electronic travel aids for blind and low vision people [5][6][7] and emergency response devices 8,9 require both complex representations of the environment (for example, through different vibration frequencies), along with fast activation and deactivation of the stimuli. Standard vibration motors for haptics, linear resonance actuators (LRAs) and eccentric rotating mass actuators (ERMs), cannot satisfy both of these requirements simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%