2021
DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2021.1958983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network and Proximity Effects on LGBTQ Youth’s Psychological Outcomes during a Camp Intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is critical given that thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness are considered to be key mechanisms and indicators of suicidality (Joiner et al, 2005). The finding that Mapping Q alters perceptions of thwarted belongingness is consistent with other types of prevention research with SGM youth populations, such that prevention programs specifically for SGM youth foster a sense of social connection via proximity reducing psychological distress (Gillig & Bighash, 2023). Mapping Q provides intentional opportunities for SGM youth to connect and develop meaningful relationships with others who embody similar sexual or gender identities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is critical given that thwarted belongingness and perceived burdensomeness are considered to be key mechanisms and indicators of suicidality (Joiner et al, 2005). The finding that Mapping Q alters perceptions of thwarted belongingness is consistent with other types of prevention research with SGM youth populations, such that prevention programs specifically for SGM youth foster a sense of social connection via proximity reducing psychological distress (Gillig & Bighash, 2023). Mapping Q provides intentional opportunities for SGM youth to connect and develop meaningful relationships with others who embody similar sexual or gender identities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Other studies have examined the importance of social support networks such as family acceptance and having friends who know about and affirm one’s gender or sexual identity (Snapp et al, 2015; Toomey, 2021). Limited research has begun to examine the role of camps for SGM youth populations as spaces for promoting well-being and reducing mental health burden (Gillig & Bighash, 2023; Weinhardt et al, 2021), suggesting that creating spaces where SGM youth come together for a shared activity provides youth with a sense of community, supports identity affirmation, and helps foster resilience. Thus, it is likely that interventions that focus on developing social support and representation for SGM youth will result reductions to thwarted belonging, which in turn will reduce compromised mental health outcomes.…”
Section: Minority Stress and Interpersonal Theories To Understand Hea...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The configuration term that refers to the popularity configuration is alternating k-star (H1) , which suggests the tendency for actors to have multiple partners (Cortina and Landis 2013) . The term for the bonding configuration is transitiveties (H2) , which indicates two actors are more likely to collaborate if they have at least one collaborator in common (Gillig and Bighash 2019; Ingold and Leifeld 2016; Siciliano, Wang and Medina 2021). These two configuration terms are illustrated in Table 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have considered summer camps, virtual camps, and camps on college campuses for LGBTQ+ youth (Gillig et al, 2019(Gillig et al, , 2022Weinhardt et al, 2021). Participants have reported pre-post increases in their hope (Gillig et al, 2019) and broader resiliency (Gillig et al, 2022;Weinhardt et al, 2021). Scholars have also pointed to community-based groups for LGBTQ+ youth that could promote their well-being, though without specific reference to hope (Fish et al, 2019).Schools are another key setting in which to consider hope among LGBTQ+ youth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important part of this work is identifying settings that may promote hope. Some studies have considered summer camps, virtual camps, and camps on college campuses for LGBTQ+ youth (Gillig et al, 2019(Gillig et al, , 2022Weinhardt et al, 2021). Participants have reported pre-post increases in their hope (Gillig et al, 2019) and broader resiliency (Gillig et al, 2022;Weinhardt et al, 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%