2013
DOI: 10.1038/srep03426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Network Analysis Reveals Functional Cross-links between Disease and Inflammation Genes

Abstract: Connections between inflammation and diseases are suggested important in understanding the genetic mechanisms of diseases. However, studies on the functional cross-links between inflammation and disease genes are still in their early stages. We integrated the protein–protein interaction (PPI), inflammation genes, and gene–disease associations to construct a disease-inflammation network (DIN). We found that nodes, which are both inflammation and disease genes (namely inter-genes), are topologically important in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to those directly overlapping nodes and edges serving as versatile players underlying the link between inflammation and cancer, we also explored other alternative approaches that inflammation might contribute to cancer in esophagus. Significant crosstalk module pairs of inflammation and cancer were thus determined based on permutation test, via randomizing PPI network with degree distribution of nodes keeping unchanged 1000 times 24 25 . With a p value cutoff of 0.05, we identified 402 significant crosstalk pairs in total ( Supplementary Table 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to those directly overlapping nodes and edges serving as versatile players underlying the link between inflammation and cancer, we also explored other alternative approaches that inflammation might contribute to cancer in esophagus. Significant crosstalk module pairs of inflammation and cancer were thus determined based on permutation test, via randomizing PPI network with degree distribution of nodes keeping unchanged 1000 times 24 25 . With a p value cutoff of 0.05, we identified 402 significant crosstalk pairs in total ( Supplementary Table 4 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…III and Stage IV COAD. Based on the assumption that the crosstalk between the stage III and stage IV COAD-related modules is significant (when the number of their interactions is significantly more than random distribution), 1000 random PPI networks were constructed (with the degree distribution of nodes in the original network remaining unchanged) [30,31]. For each pair of stage III and stage IV COAD-related modules, the real number of interactions between the module pair and the random distribution extracted from 1000 random PPI networks was compared.…”
Section: Determining Significant Crosstalk Module Pairs Of Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypergeometric calculation, which is based on certain assumptions, has been used in systems biological analyses for determining the probability of a result occurring just by chance (73)(74)(75). The hypergeometric test can be used as a measure of over-representation and takes into account the overall population size, the number of successes within this population, the sample size, and the number of successes within the sample population.…”
Section: Specificity Filter Through Pharmacophore Model Building and mentioning
confidence: 99%