Network analysis as a tool for quantifying the dynamics of metacoupled systems: an example using global soybean trade

Abstract

2018. Network analysis as a tool for quantifying the dynamics of metacoupled systems: an example using global soybean trade. Ecology and Society 23(4):3. https://doi. ABSTRACT. The metacoupling framework provides grounds for characterizing interactions within and between coupled human and natural systems, yet few studies quantify the nuances of these systems. Network analysis is a powerful and flexible tool that has been used to quantify social, economic, and ecological systems. Our objective was to evaluate the utility of network analysis for quantifying metacoupled systems by assessing global soybean trade among 217 countries from 1986 to 2013. We identified and quantified sending and receiving systems, subnetworks and flow pathways, changes over time and across scales, feedbacks, and associations between trade and tropical deforestation. Although a total of 165 distinct cliques were identified within the network, a few key players were disproportionately influential in the 2872 partnerships, including Brazil (37.5%), China (48.6%), and the USA (72.3%). Total network density increased five-fold over the study period with an increasingly smaller set of countries heavily engaged in trade, posing sustainability and food security concerns. We found evidence of a positive feedback where countries with established trade partnerships were more likely to expand trade relationships over the study period. Trade patterns were not explained by regional or continental geography, highlighting limitations of neighborhood analyses commonly used in ecology. We also found evidence of a link between soybean trade and tropical deforestation; in pantropical countries participating in soybean trade, cumulative soybean exports for the period 2000-2012 were strongly associated with remotely sensed estimates of forest loss by country (Rsq = 0.35 , p < 0.0001). We demonstrated that network analyses can be used to quantitatively assess relationships between metacoupled social-ecological systems. Increased data access and platforms for integrating diverse data sources using multidisciplinary tools will be key to pushing the boundaries of quantitative metacoupled systems research.Erratum: The figure captions in the original publication of this paper were incorrect and were replaced with the proper captions on 7 February 2019.Ecology and Society 23(4): 3 https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol23/iss4/art3/

Telecoupled Food Trade Affects Pericoupled Trade and Intracoupled Production

“…The results of the present study indicate that similar interactions may occur across system boundaries where telecouplings interact with pericouplings to enhance or offset one another. On the other hand, a network analysis of global soybean trade [16] identified Brazil, China and the U.S. as the key players but did not find regional or continental geography to be predictor of trade patterns. The present findings suggest that pericoupled relationships are important in global trade patterns and may be dwarfed, contextually and computationally, by the massive flows among Brazil, China and the U.S.…”

“…The soybean trade is representative of the ways in which distant people and places are connected through telecoupling. In the context of the global food trade, much research has been conducted on the large flow of soybeans from the Americas to China [12][13][14][15][16]. For example, many studies have documented production increases in Brazil and the United States (U.S.) as well as several other countries between adjacent systems, while telecouplings examine human-nature interactions across distance.…”

A Metacoupling Framework for Exploring Transboundary Watershed Management

“…Yet agriculture currently accounts for 60% of the watershed's water use [33]. Although mining accounts for a smaller proportion of water use (around 10%), it is expected to increase in the coming years and has caused severe environmental consequences via pollutants [34]. Around 80% of the basin experiences water stress [35].…”

“…There is currently a water deficit in the basin whereby 500 million cubic meters of water is transferred from the Orange Senqu River Basin each year [33] to meet demands. Despite such scarcity, transnational level conflicts over water security have not yet occurred at the level as seen in other parts of the world (e.g., the Mekong) [34]. Yet recent transnational efforts have been initiated to allow for increased dialogue across countries, such as The Resilience in the Limpopo River Basin (RESILIM) Program administered by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) [34].…”

A Social–Ecological Odyssey in Fisheries and Wildlife Management

“…By providing human–environmental insights beyond those generated by monothematic (i.e., social or ecological) approaches (Liu ; Schaffer‐Smith et al. ; Zhao et al. ), the metacoupling framework has great potential for advancing fisheries/wildlife research and management.…”