Network Address Translation - Protocol Translation (NAT-PT)

Tsirtsis, George; Srisuresh, Pyda

doi:10.17487/rfc2766

Cited by 261 publications

(103 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

103

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Assuming IPv6 is going to be widely deployed, network address translation techniques could play an important role in the transition process from IPv4 to IPv6 ( [13] …”

Section: Nat Rsip and Ipv6mentioning

confidence: 99%

Overview of 1999 IAB Network Layer Workshop

Kaat¹

2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Assuming IPv6 is going to be widely deployed, network address translation techniques could play an important role in the transition process from IPv4 to IPv6 ( [13] …”

Section: Nat Rsip and Ipv6mentioning

confidence: 99%

Overview of 1999 IAB Network Layer Workshop

Kaat¹

2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Network Address Translation-Protocol Translation (NAT-PT) is the combination of SIIT (old specification) and IPv4 NAT. It is specified in RFC 2766 [57] and is still valid but moved to historic status by RFC 4966 [58]. NAT-PT should not be used because it is vulnerable for DOS attacks, does not support DNSSEC, and IPsec cannot be translated.…”

Section: Translationmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Comparison of Internet Protocol (IPv6) Security Guidelines

Hermann

Fabian

2014

Future Internet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The next generation of the Internet Protocol (IPv6) is currently about to be introduced in many organizations. However, its security features are still a very novel area of expertise for many practitioners. This study evaluates guidelines for secure deployment of IPv6, published by the U.S. NIST and the German federal agency BSI, for topicality, completeness and depth. The later two are scores defined in this paper and are based on the Requests for Comments relevant for IPv6 that were categorized, weighted and ranked for importance using an expert survey. Both guides turn out to be of practical value, but have a specific focus and are directed towards different audiences. Moreover, recommendations for possible improvements are presented. Our results could also support strategic management decisions on security priorities as well as for the choice of security guidelines for IPv6 roll-outs.

show abstract

“…We consider six canonical packet processing applications: Secure Sockets Layer [10], Network Address Translation [7], IPv4/IPv6 Interoperability [21], TCP/IP header compression and decompression [15], IPv4 forwarding [13], and a 3G-wireless router (that supports IPv4/v6 interop along with header compression functionality).…”

Section: Applications and Work Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A case for run-time adaptation in packet processing systems

Kokku

Riché

Kunze

et al. 2004

SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Most packet processing applications receive and process multiple types of packets. Today, the processors available within packet processing systems are allocated to packet types at design time. In this paper, we explore the benefits and challenges of adapting allocations of processors to packet types in packet processing systems. We demonstrate that, for all the applications and traces considered, run-time adaptation can reduce energy consumption by 70-80% and processor provisioning level by 40-50%. The adaptation benefits are maximized if processor allocations can be adapted at fine timescales and if the total available processing power can be allocated to packet types in small granularities. We show that, of these two factors, allocating processing power to packet types in small granularity is more important-if the allocation granularity is large, then even a very fine adaptation time-scale yields meager benefits.

show abstract

Network Address Translation - Protocol Translation (NAT-PT)

Cited by 261 publications

References 0 publications

Overview of 1999 IAB Network Layer Workshop

Overview of 1999 IAB Network Layer Workshop

A Comparison of Internet Protocol (IPv6) Security Guidelines

A case for run-time adaptation in packet processing systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About