2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1803.00092
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NETT: Solving Inverse Problems with Deep Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence bound The idea is now to combine (10) and (12). Then, observe that minimizing the so-called (negative) evidence bound on the overall negative log-likelihood in ( 7) can be phrased as follows:…”
Section: A Maximum-likelihood (Ml) Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidence bound The idea is now to combine (10) and (12). Then, observe that minimizing the so-called (negative) evidence bound on the overall negative log-likelihood in ( 7) can be phrased as follows:…”
Section: A Maximum-likelihood (Ml) Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the emergence of deep learning, modern approaches for solving inverse problems have increasingly shifted towards data-driven reconstruction [5], which generally offers significantly superior reconstruction quality as compared to the traditional variational methods. Data-adaptive reconstruction methods can broadly be classified into two categories: (i) end-to-end trained over-parametrized models that either attempt to map the measured data to the true model parameter (such as AUTOMAP proposed in [18]), or remove artifacts from the output of an analytical reconstruction method [10], and (ii) learning the image prior using a neural network based on training data of images and then using such a learned regularizer in a variational model for reconstruction [11,12,14,16]. The first approach relies on learning the reconstruction method from a large training dataset that consists of many ordered pairs of model-parameter and corresponding noisy data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PDE is based on fundamental physical laws but the regulariser is more heuristic in nature. A number of recent works have employed deep learning to build regularisers for inverse problems, especially for seismic inversion [13,24,27] and medical imaging [17,14,2]. External operators in UFL provide a high-level programming abstraction for this problem.…”
Section: Example: Seismic Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, analytical methods, like filtered back-projection (FBP), or iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques are used for this task. Recently, image reconstruction approaches involving Deep Learning (DL) have been developed and demonstrated to be very competitive [4,9,18,22,23,30,34,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%