The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.13511.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

netSmooth: Network-smoothing based imputation for single cell RNA-seq

Abstract: Single cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) experiments suffer from a range of characteristic technical biases, such as dropouts (zero or near zero counts) and high variance. Current analysis methods rely on imputing missing values by various means of local averaging or regression, often amplifying biases inherent in the data. We present netSmooth, a network-diffusion based method that uses priors for the covariance structure of gene expression profiles on scRNA-seq experiments in order to smooth expression values. We dem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many methods have been developed for computational doublet detection (DePasquale et al, 2018; Kang et al, 2018; McGinnis et al, 2018; Wolock et al, 2018), which can be applied to the sketch to remove these potential sources of confounding variation. We also note that more advanced quality control methods, including those for normalization (Bacher et al, 2017; Lun et al, 2016b; Vallejos et al, 2017), highly variable gene filtering (Yip et al, 2018), and imputation (Van Dijk et al, 2018; Li and Li, 2018; Ronen and Akalin, 2018) can naturally be applied to a geometric sketch before further analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have been developed for computational doublet detection (DePasquale et al, 2018; Kang et al, 2018; McGinnis et al, 2018; Wolock et al, 2018), which can be applied to the sketch to remove these potential sources of confounding variation. We also note that more advanced quality control methods, including those for normalization (Bacher et al, 2017; Lun et al, 2016b; Vallejos et al, 2017), highly variable gene filtering (Yip et al, 2018), and imputation (Van Dijk et al, 2018; Li and Li, 2018; Ronen and Akalin, 2018) can naturally be applied to a geometric sketch before further analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DrImpute (Kwak et al , 2017) is a clustering-based method and uses a consensus strategy: it estimates a value with several cluster priors or distance matrices and then imputes by aggregation. As the low quality of the scRNA-seq datasets continues to be a bottleneck while the measurable cell counts keep increasing, the demand for faster and scalable imputation methods also keeps increasing (Eraslan et al , 2018;Lin et al , 2017;Ronen and Akalin, 2018) . While some of these earlier algorithms do improve the quality of original datasets and preserve the underlying biological variance (Zhang and Zhang, 2017) , often these methods demand extensive running time, impeding their adoption in the ever increasing scRNA-seq data space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abundance of dropouts (or sparsity) is a relevant feature of single cell RNA-seq data, and can be alleviated by imputing missing values using the information from co-expressed genes, or from similar cells, with several tools developed to recover the “true” expression signal ( 110 , 111 ). Interestingly, a recent comparison of several imputation methods ( 112 ) concludes that no imputation method outperforms all the others in every situation.…”
Section: Experimental and Computational Approaches For Single Cell Gementioning
confidence: 99%