2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.27.357103
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NETMAGE: a humaN-disEase phenoType MAp GEnerator for the Visualization of PheWAS

Abstract: Summary: Given genetic associations from a PheWAS, a disease-disease network can be constructed where nodes represent phenotypes and edges represent shared genetic associations between phenotypes. To improve the accessibility of the visualization of shared genetic components across phenotypes, we developed the humaN-disEase phenoType MAp GEnerator (NETMAGE), a web-based tool that produces interactive phenotype network visualizations from summarized PheWAS results. Users can search the map by a variety of attri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The full summary statistics were then filtered to exclude the following phenotypes: mQTLs, pQTLs, eQTLs, sex specific GWAS and non-EUR and non-mixed ancestry GWAS. After calculating the node and edge maps using NETMAGE (Sriram et al, 2020), only connections that represent a weight of >3 SNPs were used to make the graph more interpretable. Raw network statistics were calculated in Gephi (Bastian et al, 2009) including modularity or cluster ID using Blondel et al (Blondel et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full summary statistics were then filtered to exclude the following phenotypes: mQTLs, pQTLs, eQTLs, sex specific GWAS and non-EUR and non-mixed ancestry GWAS. After calculating the node and edge maps using NETMAGE (Sriram et al, 2020), only connections that represent a weight of >3 SNPs were used to make the graph more interpretable. Raw network statistics were calculated in Gephi (Bastian et al, 2009) including modularity or cluster ID using Blondel et al (Blondel et al, 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%