2020
DOI: 10.1534/g3.120.401067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NetExtractor: Extracting a Cerebellar Tissue Gene Regulatory Network Using Differentially Expressed High Mutual Information Binary RNA Profiles

Abstract: Bigenic expression relationships are conventionally defined based on metrics such as Pearson or Spearman correlation that cannot typically detect latent, non-linear dependencies or require the relationship to be monotonic. Further, the combination of intrinsic and extrinsic noise as well as embedded relationships between sample sub-populations reduces the probability of extracting biologically relevant edges during the construction of gene co-expression networks (GCNs). In this report, we address these problem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other measures (coefficients) one can consider which are capable of modeling both linear and nonlinear dependencies between genes are, e.g. Spearman’s rank correlation, Kendall rank correlation coefficient, the distance correlation ( Székely et al 2007 ), mutual information (see, Husain et al 2020 , and the references therein), and the maximal information coefficient ( Reshef et al 2011 ). See also Kontio et al (2020) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other measures (coefficients) one can consider which are capable of modeling both linear and nonlinear dependencies between genes are, e.g. Spearman’s rank correlation, Kendall rank correlation coefficient, the distance correlation ( Székely et al 2007 ), mutual information (see, Husain et al 2020 , and the references therein), and the maximal information coefficient ( Reshef et al 2011 ). See also Kontio et al (2020) .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional algorithms such as weighted GCN analysis (WGCNA) ( Langfelder and Horvath 2008 ) are limited by the fact that they can only identify linearly correlated relationships while struggling to differentiate between intrinsic signal and extrinsic noise. To this end, algorithms such as Knowledge Independent Network Construction (KINC) ( Ficklin et al 2017 ) and NetExtractor ( Husain et al 2020 ) were developed to capture linear and potentially nonlinear relationships that have traditionally been ignored. Integration of these nonlinear relationships, however, greatly increases the computational complexity of constructing relationship networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%