1919
DOI: 10.1017/s0021859600004779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Net energy values and starch values

Abstract: It is now accepted as a fundamental doctrine in animal nutrition that the prime function of food is to supply energy for the operation of the human or animal body and that all its other diverse uses are essentially tributary to this main purpose. The growing recognition of this fact in its relations to the nutrition of farm animals has given rise during the past twenty-five years to extensive investigations, especially by Zuntz and his associates, by Kellner and Köhler and by the writers, in which the attempt … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1931
1931
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is relatively little detailed information concerning the value of grass and grassland products as sources of energy for ruminants. Armsby and his associates (Armsby & Fries, 1915;Armsby, Fries & Braman, 1916;Armsby & Fries, 1918) studied the utilization of the energy of alfalfa, clover and timothy hays by sheep when fed at the maintenance level, using a respiration calorimeter. Mitchell, Kammlade & Hamilton (1928) examined the relative energy values of alfalfa, clover and timothy hays for the maintenance of sheep, using the carcass slaughter technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is relatively little detailed information concerning the value of grass and grassland products as sources of energy for ruminants. Armsby and his associates (Armsby & Fries, 1915;Armsby, Fries & Braman, 1916;Armsby & Fries, 1918) studied the utilization of the energy of alfalfa, clover and timothy hays by sheep when fed at the maintenance level, using a respiration calorimeter. Mitchell, Kammlade & Hamilton (1928) examined the relative energy values of alfalfa, clover and timothy hays for the maintenance of sheep, using the carcass slaughter technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= 2360 net Cal. for fattening), and express the value of the feed in terms of the final response it promotes, namely energy retention and production of eggs or milk (Armsby & Fries, 1919).…”
Section: Symposium Proceedings I955mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are interrelated: a high basal metabolism entails a greater katabolism of ingested food or body tissue to meet this demand for energy, and the higher urinary N largely made up of urea-, ammonia-and amino-N reflects the higher rate of deamination of ingested protein that occurred in order to furnish energy for this purpose. Armsby & Fries (1911) compared the utilization of feed energy by a pure-bred steer with that of a scrub steer and concluded that 'the energy requirement of the scrub steer for maintenance, computed to the same live-weight, averaged 18.7 yo higher than that of the pure-bred. Accordingly the latter was able to use a relatively larger proportion of the total energy of his ration for the production of gain.'…”
Section: Volmentioning
confidence: 99%