2014
DOI: 10.5194/amt-7-1057-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Net ecosystem CO<sub>2</sub> exchange measurements by the closed chamber method and the eddy covariance technique and their dependence on atmospheric conditions

Abstract: Abstract. Carbon dioxide flux measurements in ecosystem sciences are mostly conducted by eddy covariance technique or the closed chamber method. But there is a lack of detailed comparisons that assess present differences and uncertainties. To determine underlying processes, a 10-day, side-byside measurement of the net ecosystem exchange with both techniques was evaluated with regard to various atmospheric conditions during the diurnal cycle. It was found that, depending on the particular atmospheric condition,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, closed chamber measurements may increase spatial representativeness of plant communities to a degree but can have a reduced temporal coverage in comparison to tower measurements (Stoy et al, ). It is well documented that measured CO 2 flux estimates vary depending on the method employed (Björkmanet al, ; Oechel et al, ; Riedereret al, ). Thus, it is often important, if possible, to combine both techniques, as the information gained from each technique is complimentary and essential for understanding spatial and temporal patterns in fluxes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, closed chamber measurements may increase spatial representativeness of plant communities to a degree but can have a reduced temporal coverage in comparison to tower measurements (Stoy et al, ). It is well documented that measured CO 2 flux estimates vary depending on the method employed (Björkmanet al, ; Oechel et al, ; Riedereret al, ). Thus, it is often important, if possible, to combine both techniques, as the information gained from each technique is complimentary and essential for understanding spatial and temporal patterns in fluxes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Closed chambers completely cover the ecosystem during the measurement process and thereby alter the natural long-wave radiation balance to almost zero. This causes reduced surface cooling, weak development of stable stratification, and, finally, higher respiration than those obtained via eddy covariance measurements [76]. Secondly, our annual average ecosystem respiration estimates based on chamber measurements may have uncertainties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Also, given uncertainties regarding determination of respiration, characteristics need to be further investigated. Chamber measurements require detailed consideration of atmospheric conditions (Riederer et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%