2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12595-013-0060-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nesting Site of House Crow: Tree Versus Light-Post—An Impact Assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With numerous studies carried out in Europe and North America since the beginning of the previous century, we found only nine and two studies on the colonization/invasion of a non-native corvid (House Crow) in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, respectively. In addition, some species have been the object of numerous management studies, especially the House Crow [ 10 , 125 , 162 , 164 , 171 ], the American Crow [ 124 , 165 , 172 ], the Eurasian Magpie [ 138 , 173 , 174 ] and, to a smaller extent, the Common Raven [ 76 , 156 ], the Hooded Crow [ 100 , 168 , 175 ] and the Rook [ 168 ]. Studies of management have reported on the use of different methods ranging from direct shooting [ 171 ], trapping [ 14 , 100 , 175 ], egg removal [ 164 ], poisoning [ 164 ], pruning roost trees [ 125 ], acoustic scaring of birds [ 124 , 176 ], dispersing roosts with lasers [ 165 ] and refuse management in cities [ 177 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With numerous studies carried out in Europe and North America since the beginning of the previous century, we found only nine and two studies on the colonization/invasion of a non-native corvid (House Crow) in sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America, respectively. In addition, some species have been the object of numerous management studies, especially the House Crow [ 10 , 125 , 162 , 164 , 171 ], the American Crow [ 124 , 165 , 172 ], the Eurasian Magpie [ 138 , 173 , 174 ] and, to a smaller extent, the Common Raven [ 76 , 156 ], the Hooded Crow [ 100 , 168 , 175 ] and the Rook [ 168 ]. Studies of management have reported on the use of different methods ranging from direct shooting [ 171 ], trapping [ 14 , 100 , 175 ], egg removal [ 164 ], poisoning [ 164 ], pruning roost trees [ 125 ], acoustic scaring of birds [ 124 , 176 ], dispersing roosts with lasers [ 165 ] and refuse management in cities [ 177 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative impact of human-made landscapes and infrastructures on wildlife has been detected in many studies [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. However, numerous studies have also described how certain species, such as corvids (e.g., crows, magpies), can benefit from these infrastructures, such as using buildings, poles and power lines as nesting sites [ 9 , 10 , 11 ]. In addition, anthropogenic food resources and milder microclimate in cities might benefit many corvid species [ 1 , 2 , 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mauritius, Singapore, Kolkatta, etc. (Feare and Mungroo 1989;Soh, et al 2002;Dutta and Raut, 2013). Although in India, the house crow has its mythological importance, the presence of crows is not a nuisance except for a few places where they attack humans (Dutta & Raut 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several possible reasons, that are not necessarily mutually exclusive, affecting the population trends of corvids in urban areas. For example, low levels of predation [ 25 ], good availability of (artificial) food resources [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ] as well as an availability artificial nest sites [ 13 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ] may benefit corvids. However, some studies have indicated that hunting activities [ 17 , 34 ] and persecution [ 12 , 14 , 35 ] may have negative influences on corvids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%