1982
DOI: 10.2307/3808415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nesting Habitat of Coexisting Accipiter in Oregon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of a cool microsite (north exposure and near water) seems important mainly in more southern latitudes of the species' range. Variation in nesting habitat is evident when comparing nest sites used in Nevada, which are in parklike aspen with little understory and high canopy closure (Younk and Bechard 1994), to nest sites in Oregon, which are in stands with the complex structure of old-growth forest (Reynolds et al 1982). Some evidence suggests that reoccupancy of nest stands is related to nest stand size.…”
Section: Systematics-inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The importance of a cool microsite (north exposure and near water) seems important mainly in more southern latitudes of the species' range. Variation in nesting habitat is evident when comparing nest sites used in Nevada, which are in parklike aspen with little understory and high canopy closure (Younk and Bechard 1994), to nest sites in Oregon, which are in stands with the complex structure of old-growth forest (Reynolds et al 1982). Some evidence suggests that reoccupancy of nest stands is related to nest stand size.…”
Section: Systematics-inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors who have studied goshawks in the Western United States have suggested that extensive timber harvesting may result in reductions in goshawk abundance (e.g., Hennessy 1978, Reynolds et al 1982, Moore and Henny 1983, Hall 1984, Bloom et al 1986, Woodbridge 1988, Crocker-Bedford 1990, Patla 1990. Two studies document reduced nest reoccupancy after timber harvesting (CrockerBedford 1990, Patla 1990).…”
Section: Systematics-inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While generalists at large spatial scales, goshawks consistently nest in mature trees set amid groups of codominant, close-canopy neighbors (Reynolds et al 1982, Squires and Reynolds 1997, DeStefano 1998. This nest grove is situated within a larger (10-100ha) homogenous forest stand typified by deep, closed canopies and little shrub cover (Reynolds et al 1992, Finn et al 2002b.…”
Section: Biology Of Predatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nest areas usually contain relatively high tree canopy cover and a high density of large trees (Bartelt 1977;Crocker-Bedford and Chaney 1988;Daw and others 1998;Hall 1984;Hayward and Escano 1989;Kennedy 1988Kennedy , 2003McGowan 1975;Moore and Henny 1983;Reynolds 1982;Reynolds and others 1982;Saunders 1982;Speiser and Bosakowski 1987). Although goshawks are considered habitat generalists at large spatial scales and use a wide variety of forest types, they tend to nest in a relatively narrow range of forest structural conditions (Erickson 1987;Hargis and others 1994;Palmer 1988;Reynolds and others 1982;Saunders 1982;Squires and Reynolds 1997;Squires and Ruggiero 1996).…”
Section: Nest Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%