2007
DOI: 10.1676/06-138.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nesting Behavior and Nestling Care of the Pavonine Quetzal (Pharomachrus pavoninus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although provisioning rates of Orange‐breasted and Red‐headed trogons were low (∼ 1 delivery/h/nestling), food items were large as reported for other Neotropical trogons (Skutch 1976, Johnsgard 2000). We also found that males of both species played a greater role in provisioning nestlings than females, and similar observations have been reported for Resplendent Quetzals (Wheelwright 1983), Narina Trogons (Zimmerman et al 1996), and Pavonine Quetzals ( Pharomachrus pavoninus ; Lebbin 2007). However, male and female Elegant Trogons ( Trogon elegans ; Hall and Karubian 1996) and Golden‐headed Quetzals ( Pharomachrus auriceps ; Lohnes and Greeney 2008) provision nestlings at similar rates, whereas female Mountain Trogons ( T. mexicanus ) were reported as being more efficient food providers than males (Johnsgard 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although provisioning rates of Orange‐breasted and Red‐headed trogons were low (∼ 1 delivery/h/nestling), food items were large as reported for other Neotropical trogons (Skutch 1976, Johnsgard 2000). We also found that males of both species played a greater role in provisioning nestlings than females, and similar observations have been reported for Resplendent Quetzals (Wheelwright 1983), Narina Trogons (Zimmerman et al 1996), and Pavonine Quetzals ( Pharomachrus pavoninus ; Lebbin 2007). However, male and female Elegant Trogons ( Trogon elegans ; Hall and Karubian 1996) and Golden‐headed Quetzals ( Pharomachrus auriceps ; Lohnes and Greeney 2008) provision nestlings at similar rates, whereas female Mountain Trogons ( T. mexicanus ) were reported as being more efficient food providers than males (Johnsgard 2000).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…J. Field Ornithol. observations have been reported for Resplendent Quetzals (Wheelwright 1983), Narina Trogons (Zimmerman et al 1996), and Pavonine Quetzals (Pharomachrus pavoninus; Lebbin 2007). However, male and female Elegant Trogons (Trogon elegans; Hall and Karubian 1996) and Golden-headed Quetzals (Pharomachrus auriceps; Lohnes and Greeney 2008) provision nestlings at similar rates, whereas female Mountain Trogons (T. mexicanus) were reported as being more efficient food providers than males (Johnsgard 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1996); 6 Wheelwright (1983); 7 Skutch (1944); 8 LaBastille et al. (1972); 9 Bowes and Allen (1969); 10 Pulgarin‐R and Laverde‐R (2015); 11 Lebbin (2007); 12 Skutch (1959); 13 Hall and Karublan (1996); 14 Skutch (1942); 15 Skutch (1956); 16 Schulenberg and Greeney (2020); 17 Johnsgard (2000); 18 Skutch (1972); 19 Skutch (1948); 20 Riehl (2005); 21 Skutch (1962); 22 Haverschmidt (1968); and 23 Skutch (1972).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, male peacocks spread and shake their tails to attract potential mates (Alcock, ). The elaborate ornamentation of the male quetzal is displayed to obtain female mating acceptance (Lebbin, ); similarly, sage grouse birds display their plumage to attract a mate (Alcock, ). These sensory signals usually lead to mating responses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%