2014
DOI: 10.1292/jvms.13-0197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nested PCR Detection and Phylogenetic Analysis of <i>Babesia bovis</i> and <i>Babesia bigemina</i> in Cattle from Peri-Urban Localities in Gauteng Province, South Africa

Abstract: Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina are tick-borne hemoparasites causing babesiosis in cattle worldwide. This study was aimed at providing information about the occurrence and geographical distribution of B. bovis and B. bigemina species in cattle from Gauteng province, South Africa. A total of 268 blood samples collected from apparently healthy animals in 14 different peri-urban localities were tested using previously established nested PCR assays for the detection of B. bovis and B. bigemina species-specific … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A close genetic relationship was observed between our strain and other strains from Argentine, USA and Brazil. Similar result was investigated by a research work conducted by [21], they found that nested PCR technique conducted to amplify rhoptry-associated protein 1 (RAP-1) produced a close genetic relationship of South African strain of B. bovis strains with other strains from Uruguay, Argentine, Brazil and USA. However, the presence of polymorphism can adequately discriminate between a species and another [22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…A close genetic relationship was observed between our strain and other strains from Argentine, USA and Brazil. Similar result was investigated by a research work conducted by [21], they found that nested PCR technique conducted to amplify rhoptry-associated protein 1 (RAP-1) produced a close genetic relationship of South African strain of B. bovis strains with other strains from Uruguay, Argentine, Brazil and USA. However, the presence of polymorphism can adequately discriminate between a species and another [22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…There is a paucity of Babesia surveillance data in humans in Africa, despite evidence that Babesia is present in the region. [16][17][18] A newly developed B. microti ELISA was used to conduct pilot surveillance in Kilosa district where the presence of Babesia is plausible, and high prevalence of malaria poses a risk of misdiagnosis and underreporting. The study findings are mixed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a paucity of human surveillance data on Babesia in Africa, although its presence in ticks and its role as a significant veterinary pathogen is well established. [15][16][17][18][19][20] Of particular interest, B. microti 18 and B. microti-like parasites 21 have been recovered from nonhuman primates in Africa. Babesia overlaps clinically and diagnostically with Plasmodium spp.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bovine tick-borne diseases (TBDs) are caused in Brazil mainly by Babesia bovis, B. bigemina and Anaplasma marginale, which occur throughout the tropical, subtropical and temperate areas of the world (Guglielmone, 1995;Echaide et al, 1998;Tembue et al, 2011;Ait-Hamou et al, 2012). As TBD agents are simultaneously present in most regions of enzootic stability or instability (Barros et al, 2005;Atif et al, 2012;Shebish et al, 2012;Brito et al, 2013;Mtshali The results of natural transplacental transmissions in several studies differ, and report absent (Piercy, 1956;Kuttler et al, 1962), low (Passos and Lima, 1984;Ribeiro et al, 1995) or moderate transmission (Maldonado et al, 2012; rates, which lead to the hypothesis that the importance of this transmission pathway may vary by region, depending on the climate characteristics, the cattle, and the presence of vectors, or it may be based on the genetic variability of the agent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%