“…Although there are plenty of relevant stochastic reconstruction methods, including multiple‐point statistics (Ding, Teng, Wang, He, & Feng, 2018; Gravey & Mariethoz, 2020; Tahmasebi & Sahimi, 2012) or machine learning‐based techniques (Feng et al, 2019; Mosser, Dubrule, & Blunt, 2017), the methods based on correlation functions (CFs) possess a number of distinct advantages: (a) they can describe the structure of soil by way of a rigorous mathematical function (Torquato, 2002), (b) they allow rescaling of the structural data by manipulating correlation functions (Gerke, Karsanina, & Mallants, 2015; Karsanina & Gerke, 2018), (c) they provide a hierarchical annealing scheme to create a multiscale structure of desired resolution (Karsanina & Gerke, 2018; Lemmens et al, 2019), (d) they allow expression of an estimation of physical properties using rigorous bounds (Torquato, 2002), (e) they provide a tool to access structure stationarity as related to representativity (Gerke et al, 2020), (f) they are capable of incorporating experimentally measured correlation functions obtained using small‐angle scattering (Debye, Anderson Jr, & Brumberger, 1957; Karsanina et al, 2019), (g) they can facilitate correct tensorial physical property simulations based on geometrically‐periodic replicas of real soil samples (Gerke, Karsanina, & Katsman, 2019), and (h) they can describe the dynamics of soil structure (Chen, Xu, Chawla, Ren, & Jiao, 2019; Karsanina, Gerke, Skvortsova, & Mallants, 2015). Note that not all of the aforementioned separate advantages are exclusive to correlation functions; some of them can be achieved using more conventional descriptors, such as, for example, Minkowski functionals and other metrics (Schlüter & Vogel, 2011).…”